Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 25/07/2015]
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:42 am
We've had those for 4 years.yonzo_rikuo wrote:you should put people should advise a user to stop doing their annoying behaviour
We've had those for 4 years.yonzo_rikuo wrote:you should put people should advise a user to stop doing their annoying behaviour
well ok thenCLgaming wrote:We've had those for 4 years.yonzo_rikuo wrote:you should put people should advise a user to stop doing their annoying behaviour
I can't recall too well, uh... I think he was immature and tended to make trouble then he got banned for it.Jebus wrote:May i ask why combine was banned/pardoned?
The rules wrote:[UPDATED 01/08/2016] You will not be subject to the tier system if you are found to be breaking rules continuously regardless of the warning of fellow users and/or moderators, in these cases a permanent ban will be applied if the user is found to be unwilling to cooperate.
Considering the comments some can make, 90 x 90 is not really that small. Large avatars just distract from the posts and makes pages load slower on mobile (same deal with huge signatures).Jebus wrote:Any chance of the maximum avatar size being upped anytime soon? 90x90 is incredibly small.
I understand this but compared to every other forum 90x90 is tiny, You cant fit most images into it. The forum also doesnt have a auto downscale feature so you gotta manually crop and downscale the image.KirbyMario12345 wrote:Considering the comments some can make, 90 x 90 is not really that small. Large avatars just distract from the posts and makes pages load slower on mobile (same deal with huge signatures).Jebus wrote:Any chance of the maximum avatar size being upped anytime soon? 90x90 is incredibly small.
So probably not.
Yes it does. When you add an avatar you can manually the set the size you want the image to be in the field below the URL, so just set it to 90x90 and you're good.Jebus wrote:The forum also doesnt have a auto downscale feature so you gotta manually crop and downscale the image.
While I personally think that the limit on avatars should be increased to 100x100, I don't see why it matters that much.Jebus wrote:I understand this but compared to every other forum 90x90 is tiny, You cant fit most images into it.