SCP: Containment Breach

A place to discuss anything related to the game SCP:CB.
Ely
Dr. Bright's Assistant
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:47 am

SCP: Containment Breach

Postby Ely » Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:47 am

The point of game is conclused to kill SCP-682-A (which is reptile). Throughout the game we trying to activate flamepower system (by using power supply buttons in SCP areas), which is located in the object's chamber. Therefore, we can't do it until we kill SCP-682-B (which is little girl) his owner. It is possible with the any type of the gun, that we find on the stages (at the SCP locations mostly), such as knives, carbines, rifles etc. Descently we can kill other SCP facilities too. Also there are other SCP concerned to SCP-682-A, such as SCP-682-C, who can kill you with his own body mass by falling upon you from the ceil, SCP-682-D is a giant lizard that can kill you with his own eyesight, and SCP-682-D is a human vampire who is attempted to drench your life. At the end we have nothing to do, except of to press on the button and escape from the complex.
SCP-294, SCP-914 and SCP-1162 doesn't need, should be invented SCP-547, (self-changing universal card).
SCP-882 and SCP-464 are consideing to the previos SCP, they had to be removed. As and other unnecessary furniture. And too many unusable premises.
SCP-249, SCP-519 and SCP-1269 are trash (doesn't need too).
SCP-012 should be reworked as music box.
SCP-042 (which is finally form of SCP-805 and SCP-1194) should be involved in game as a neutral mob, who can fling out you from the way.
SCP-372, SCP-547-D, SCP-789, and SCP-957 are potential monsters who can hide under personal staff.
SCP-087 the game; is the chapter of SCP:CB, that should be combined with the main part.
The game should be renamed as just SCP (Secure. Containment. Procedures.).
P.P.S.: There is should be dot in the center of logo.

Image
Last edited by Ely on Wed Jul 26, 2017 4:39 am, edited 62 times in total.

User avatar
DL_Baryonyx
Guard
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 12:34 pm

Re: SCP

Postby DL_Baryonyx » Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:35 pm

......What ?

User avatar
Zackonark
Guard
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2015 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: SCP

Postby Zackonark » Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:22 pm

Hahaha.

No.

User avatar
AgentParadox
MTF
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 2:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Re: SCP - Containment Breach.

Postby AgentParadox » Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:21 pm

What I got from this word salad is that they want a bunch of SCPs (that aren't in the game to begin with), 294 and 914 removed, and they want SCP-012 rewritten as a music box. They also want a bunch of made-up SCP-682 instances wrecking the facility.

Here's a message to the creator of this thread. You can't alter SCPs just for the sake of Containment Breach, that's not how adding SCPs works. If you wanted 012 changed, you'd have to ask the SCP Foundation themselves. 012 has been in its current state for a long time however, and changing it would have a MASSIVE negative backlash. You also should not create SCPs just to get them in Containment Breach, that really isn't an admirable goal. The "As and other furniture" bit however, I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. Also, Regalis (and 99% of SCP:CB's players) have all stated that there won't be firearms in the official Containment Breach. Ever. Play Third Subvision's (PXLSHN and Vane Brain) Nine-Tailed-Fox mod instead.

Also, if the game were renamed to just "SCP" that'd be really misleading, as there are tons of SCP games out there, not just Containment Breach. Again, SCP Containment Breach has been its name since day 1, and if changed would also have a huge negative impact. Heck, Regalis' first SCP game was SCP-087-B, a spin-off of Haversine's own SCP-087 game.

As for the ideas themselves, I'll try my best to critique them fairly.

SCP-682-B: Having a little girl SCP isn't original. It's been done countless times, even if this one is tied to a giant reptile that can adapt to physical trauma, elements and nuclear bombs. The fact it's friendly with 682 is very reminiscent of the Experiment Log where 053 was put into 682's chamber and eventually interacted with it.

SCP-682-C: A giant lizard that kills you by falling on you? That isn't SCP material, it might as well be a big fuzzy grizzly bear, should that be the case.

SCP-682-D: There are probably many SCPS that kill you upon you looking at them, but having those that kill upon them looking at you? I'm not so sure. This is also basically just regular SCP-682, but "he can kill you with laser eyes!"

SCP-682-E: Having an SCP based off of an urban legend or mythical beast has been done before, and is not new or original, but it could work. However, what you appear to have done is written a description of a generic vampire, which isn't really SCP material, unless some other properties offset it from other vampires. (Also, the word you're looking for is "drain". "Drench" means to soak something or someone with a large volume of liquid, such as water.)

Extra Notes: the people who manage the Foundation site and those who are responsible for Containment Breach are two different parties. Additionally, changing the logo would cause the same negative backlash, unless it were used for a separate branch of the Foundation, like the Nine-Tailed-Fox squad having its own logo.
You cannot grasp ████'s true form

User avatar
CommanderMark
Senior Staff
Posts: 2547
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: SCP - Containment Breach.

Postby CommanderMark » Tue Jul 18, 2017 3:12 am

AgentParadox wrote:-multi paragraph unironic rant-

Image
"One of the coolest things about finishing a project is hearing what the dev says about working with me." ~Lotims, the best worst short film maker.

Ely
Dr. Bright's Assistant
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:47 am

Re: SCP - Containment Breach.

Postby Ely » Tue Jul 18, 2017 4:08 am

SCP-682-B is known as SCP-053 either.

User avatar
AgentParadox
MTF
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 2:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Re: SCP - Containment Breach.

Postby AgentParadox » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:55 am

Ely wrote:SCP-682-B is known as SCP-053 either.


Wait, are you saying that 682-B should also be known as SCP-053? Or not? Because if it's the former, then that's confusing. Have you actually read the whole post?
You cannot grasp ████'s true form

Ely
Dr. Bright's Assistant
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:47 am

Re: SCP - Containment Breach.

Postby Ely » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:02 am

AgentParadox wrote:
Ely wrote:SCP-682-B is known as SCP-053 either.


Wait, are you saying that 682-B should also be known as SCP-053?

Backwards.
Last edited by Ely on Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cubesy
Class-D
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Cell Block C, Hallway A, Cell #8

Re: SCP - Containment Breach

Postby Cubesy » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:11 am

My head hurts,
but as Paradox said: You cant change a SCP, or it will have alot of negative backlash, nor changing the logo AND the name of the game. If 012 were to be changed, it'd have to be under -10 rating on the writing wikia and hated. Unless you want to change SCP-682 or 012, get a wikidot account, and magically edit the two to however you want to, which i would not advise, since you'd get banned.
Anyways: Onto the name and logo change: SCP just being SCP would mean nothing.
The reason why CB (or Containment Breach) Is there is BECAUSE a breach happens, getting rid of it just makes its confusing and attracts less people.
Anyways, judging by your account age, you barged into the fourms since you either: already hate the game
OR
Are a troll.
I bid you adieu, sir!
:079_2:
beep.
boop.
beep.
:079_2:
Image

User avatar
AgentParadox
MTF
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 2:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Re: SCP - Containment Breach.

Postby AgentParadox » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:50 am

Ely wrote:
AgentParadox wrote:Wait, are you saying that 682-B should also be known as SCP-053?

Backwards.


They're not going to change the designation of 053, because that's not how it works. It has to be either associated biologically with, or created by, SCP-682, and 053 is its own thing.
You cannot grasp ████'s true form


Return to “General discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AngelShy and 6 guests