Last but not least, thanks to the good Dr_Gears for preserving this abomination.
(NSFW)
SCP-682-1
SCP-682-2

Do not want...arts good though.

The other pictures must feel so unloved right now.

That artwork is awesome! That way the MTF should look like

SFK363 wrote:

Steelpoint wrote:SCP-682-1
SCP-682-2

Steelpoint, I thought you said pornography wasn't allowed on the forum?

You honestly think that is Porn? I think our definitions are getting a bit mixed here.

This is suggestive content, no sex is shown. I clearly marked the content as being NSFW but I ensured that this content was not Pornography.

Steelpoint wrote:

SFK363 wrote:

Steelpoint wrote:SCP-682-1
SCP-682-2

Steelpoint, I thought you said pornography wasn't allowed on the forum?

You honestly think that is Porn? I think our definitions are getting a bit mixed here.

This is suggestive content, no sex is shown. I clearly marked the content as being NSFW but I ensured that this content was not Pornography.

Well, it is sexual content...

SFK363 wrote:

Steelpoint wrote:

SFK363 wrote: Steelpoint, I thought you said pornography wasn't allowed on the forum?

You honestly think that is Porn? I think our definitions are getting a bit mixed here.

This is suggestive content, no sex is shown. I clearly marked the content as being NSFW but I ensured that this content was not Pornography.

Well, it is sexual content...

Doesn't mean its porn. Just let it be, you are getting annoying.

spartan322 wrote:

SFK363 wrote:

Steelpoint wrote:You honestly think that is Porn? I think our definitions are getting a bit mixed here.

This is suggestive content, no sex is shown. I clearly marked the content as being NSFW but I ensured that this content was not Pornography.

Well, it is sexual content...

Doesn't mean its porn. Just let it be, you are getting annoying.

I never said it was displeasing.

I will point to the Rules that they are up to interpretation to the acting Moderator/Admin.

In my view (Take it as you will) I clearly indicated that the content was NSFW and the content in question does no show any overt sexual situations. And is on par to content found in PG/M rated content. However if any Mod has a problem then please indicate so.

Now on topic.

SCP-Tan

SCP-939

SCP-682

Classy 682

Steelpoint wrote:
SCP-682

I like this one. =)