Re: A focus on stability?

#11
Zarpox wrote:
Hahmonen wrote:Not actually, but i remember it as the "never crashing" version, not sure anymore because it was on an old computer that has better support for old stuff like this.
I understand what you mean, that version was around for a while, but I just played it for a few minutes again now and it does have it's fair share of bugs that some people may have forgotten about.
Well, as the hardware and software keep going away from supporting this old software, it's possible that there is bugs that weren't there before.

Re: A focus on stability?

#12
Hahmonen wrote:Well, as the hardware and software keep going away from supporting this old software, it's possible that there is bugs that weren't there before.
Who knows? But in this case, playing 1.3 on an old pc should still be better then, and to have a fair comparison to older versions like 0.6.6.
LORD DEATH wrote:I'm sure that with every new item implemented, the bug squashing gets significantly harder.
I can imagine it does. But like, what is more important? More content or less bugs? At this point, less bugs of course. And by that logic, you can just play the earlier versions to get fewer bugs but less stuff to do? Anyway, I still really like the game, no matter what version.

Re: A focus on stability?

#15
Cridone wrote:
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
THAT'S DEPLORABLE AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED
Lol, look at that guy''s (HIS. DICC.) location and occupation.
Playing SCP : Containment Breach since v0.6.5.

My favorite SCP's: Pretty much all of them

Image

Re: A focus on stability?

#16
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
Spoiler
Image
"Is he dead?"
"You wanna check his pulse?"
"Um, let's just say he's dead."

Re: A focus on stability?

#17
:laugh:
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
Last edited by LORD DEATH on Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
===============================
History is written by the victor~Winston Churchill
===============================

Re: A focus on stability?

#18
LORD DEATH wrote:
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
Whaaaat? (Laughing while typing) Uhm.....K? :laugh:
In all honesty this guy is kind of funny.
Edit: Oops. Looks like I accidentally double posted. Is it possible to delete this?
Last edited by LORD DEATH on Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
===============================
History is written by the victor~Winston Churchill
===============================

Re: A focus on stability?

#19
Frankly it depends on the users. I used to use Zoho for bug tracking, and asked users to report bugs using a provided template. The bug tracker allowed me to chomp through bugs, but it was largely my own reported/noted bugs on the list, and very few ones were reported by users.

Point being that given a comprehensive list of known bugs, it's a lot easier to provide stability to the software than just blindly "optimising code" in the hopes that it fixes bugs.
SCP - Box of Horrors v0.8.0b
Twitter
Github Profile