Because SCP:CB is so unstable that we've already had enough moments where cheating was required to progress. Also, check the containment breach Gamepedia wiki to learn why 689 wasn't added.laurhead wrote:can you please add 689 to game? if it is overpowering then why don't the player just turn on godmode?
Re: SCP-689?
#73This isn't the place to discuss this.laurhead wrote:what scp would you prefer for scp cb scp - 689 or scp - 650?
Re: SCP-689?
#74laurhead wrote:I would like to see scp - 689 in the game. which version of scp cb do you think it would be added in if you where to add it at all?
I would consider your suggestions if it weren't for the fact you usually post them in threads over 2 years old. Can you please stop that? K thanks.laurhead wrote:can you please add 689 to game? if it is overpowering then why don't the player just turn on godmode?
Re: SCP-689?
#75Im thinking this guy is intentionally spamming.laurhead wrote:can you please add scp - 689?!
Safe Euclid Keter Thaumiel\ /
Re: SCP-689?
#76First of all, why are you spamming every thread with SCP suggestions?laurhead wrote:can you please add scp - 689?!
Second, Regalis won't add SCP-689 because he already considered adding it to the game earlier but did not do so due to being too OP.
Playing SCP : Containment Breach since v0.6.5.
My favorite SCP's: Pretty much all of them
My favorite SCP's: Pretty much all of them
Re: SCP-689?
#78can you please stop spamming and/or leave the forums altogether all you have ever done is flood the forums with spam comments, 20 odd might not seem like alot but even that is annoying dose of spam. worst thing is you ignore us and state THE EXACT SAME THING!!!!!!.laurhead wrote:can you please add scp - 689?!
Safe Euclid Keter Thaumiel\ /
Re: SCP-689?
#79laurhead wrote:can you please add scp - 689?!
Spoiler
I think by now he's just trolling lolPlaying SCP : Containment Breach since v0.6.5.
My favorite SCP's: Pretty much all of them
My favorite SCP's: Pretty much all of them
Re: SCP-689?
#80I think he deserves a good old ban after all this spam (i wish spam ended with N so it would rhyme) dont you?AveryLP wrote:I think by now he's just trolling lollaurhead wrote:can you please add scp - 689?!
Now lets get back on topic, This SCP could work, but it would have to be nerfed, i could see it being fit into the upcoming security cameras as a trap that SCP-079 deploys on one of the screens, D-9431 (or is it D-9341?) would have to avoid looking at the randomly chose camera, SCP-714 will make it fail to harm you, so it would be a good idea to wear that if you want some of the items in the room.
Safe Euclid Keter Thaumiel\ /