Search found 95 matches

Re: Hey!

Don't see why this couldn't be posted here - It's the general discussion after all. This is the General Discussion about the game SCP Containment Breach. Which is why it's a part of the "SCP Containment Breach" sub-forum. Intros would probably be better placed in the "General Off Topic" . Regardles...

Re: SCP foundation Wiki dead ?

Not only is the SCP wiki active, it pretty much never was THIS active before. I remember back in 2010 where days would go by without anyone posting anything, now as you go through the recent posts page it keeps getting new ones. Heck, the newest article is from three days ago, I dunno what you meant...

Re: MODELING REQUESTS: SCP-860-1 (The Forest)

Will there be any SCP's appearing there? 860 and its forest and monster are an SCP itself, and I think it'd be better if other SCPs didn't enter it. The monster inside 860-1 indeed doesn't have an "official" designation. The reason for that is that I completely forgot about giving it one. it was my...

Re: Fanart

Steelpoint wrote: SCP-682
By far the best representation of 682 I've ever seen.
Last but not least, thanks to the good Dr_Gears for preserving this abomination.
(NSFW)
SCP-682-1
SCP-682-2
...I hate the fact that I'm kinda jealous of the D-class/scientist/whatever.

Re: Stuff i have to say about the game, listen, my children.

I disagree with you regarding the length of the game; 1 - 2 hours for it is prefect. If it took more time to finish it, it'd start to get really boring, really fast, as the game doesn't really have content for more than that.
Otherwise, you have good points, specially regarding 173's spawn rate.

Go to advanced search