Nehpys wrote:the ignorant can educate themselves on what ports there are

This. Now I can just link them this post instead of having to try and remember.

SentientCloud wrote:he could surprise players by warping out of walls the player is near (maybe with a jumpscare sound) once they've gone far enough and he is out of sight. I think It'd make him seem a little more intelligent

He was planned to do that in the Irrlicht Port.

CommanderMark wrote:pointless

It's really not that hard. That's my point

Port attempt count: 10

Does anyone have any proof of actually surviving it? Every 8 in 10 youtube letsplays that encounter it make it by in three save loads. Not that hard. I have watched very many videos (minimum 75) of SCP:CB from various YouTubers, and I have yet to see one person survive it. I have watched a minimum ...

StabbedMeat wrote:Does anyone have any proof of actually surviving it?

Every 8 in 10 youtube letsplays that encounter it make it by in three save loads. Not that hard.

The old scp 106 was scary the new one is just annoying and nothing else i tried 0.2 version and 106 was so terrifying he appeared in dark places and was faster etc this new 1 is just annoying and the pocket dimension seems worse than the old one the room with the floating stones make zero sence and...

If you're willing to do it, then go ahead. The game is open source.

some group of skilled developers COULD make this a mod for SCP:CB. skilled developers COULD make this a mod COULD Key word COULD. Who WOULD? Could you? Would you? On a train? Nobody has the dedication to make a huge mod for an admittedly slowly dying game. But you could! If you learned Blitz3D! Whi...

Oh, and in case you couldn't tell/haven't been around, ports/rewrites aren't easy, the current Unity port is roughly the ninth(?) large scale attempt of porting the game.