Search found 1284 matches

Re: [v1.3.0] Multiple Bugs

I hope you know that it is not because of 1.3.0. This bugs can be found also in previous versions... but we will try to do with them something :wink: You know, making excuses isn't really becoming of a developer. I like the new custom song list feature of the radio. Now when I play SCP:CB*, I can l...

Re: glitches in 1.2.4

Well... files for this room called "testroom" and in code it is also "testroom" But why it is called like that? I will not say because Reg will be mad at me Hm... alright, good enough I guess. Still, you got mad at someone who couldn't have possibly known this, with seemingly no intention of correc...

Re: glitches in 1.2.4

Well... files for this room called "testroom" and in code it is also "testroom" But why it is called like that? I will not say because Reg will be mad at me Hm... alright, good enough I guess. Still, you got mad at someone who couldn't have possibly known this, with seemingly no intention of correc...

Re: glitches in 1.2.4

It is a big testroom, but okay.. if you want to call it 682 chamber - fine So you're gonna complain about not seeing proof when calling something one thing, yet you're not going to provide proof when you call it something else. Do I need to show proofs that it is testroom? Since you're making the c...

Re: glitches in 1.2.4

It is a big testroom, but okay.. if you want to call it 682 chamber - fine So you're gonna complain about not seeing proof when calling something one thing, yet you're not going to provide proof when you call it something else. I think you're letting that pride of being a minor developer of a forme...

Re: glitches in 1.2.4

Dude, it's been implied that place has been the entrance to 682's chamber since the old forums were a thing. That has never been contested by Regalis, 682's doc is there, and the room gets filled with gas which would imply it's one of the most protected chambers in the facility. While it's all impl...

Go to advanced search