sounds like 966 might need some work thenDropTherapy wrote:I DON'T USUALLY CARE ABOUT SCP 966.
that was the best part thoAveryLP wrote:The only criticism that I personally have to give is that SCP-178 got removed.
sounds like 966 might need some work thenDropTherapy wrote:I DON'T USUALLY CARE ABOUT SCP 966.
that was the best part thoAveryLP wrote:The only criticism that I personally have to give is that SCP-178 got removed.
no it's a hack stay away from itWhale wrote:This is amazing.
I disagree.Cpalm95 wrote:A. Its an SCP and the more SCP's the better