Apparently the Nordic version of Adam and Eve is "Ask and Embla", which translates to ash and elm (trees). So it's his way of elaborately classifying the proposal as the origin of the Foundation and the first SCP.

If I were to guess, Thaumiel designates that the object is neither safe nor dangerous. It may sound like a paradox, but think about it. This proposal isn't dangerous because it doesn't directly pose much threat, if any (From what I read, anyway), but it isn't safe because it's the source of all anomalous Keter objects.

**SPOILERS**

Keter - SCP's with powerful and aggresive properties
Euclid - Properties not fully understood
Safe - SCP that does not pose a threat
My proposal - SCP that isn't capable of harm unless interacted with
Thaumiel shouldn't be designated as extremely dangerous. That's stupid. SCP 682 is a class Keter and is still extremely dangerous. So what's the point?

Sorry about the bump, but there is a new Thaumiel that might win the spot of SCP-2000.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/2000contestffb
It is currently in first place for the spot of SCP-2000 with a rating of +166, with the second place "Anomalous Transmission, 2485 MHz" trailing behind with +149.

Request Lock.

Horrordar wrote:Request Lock.

Request denied. It's relevant.

Hey you guys might be new to the forum, avoid posting in threads that may be a little too old, alright? Although, i'm going to consider it completely passable because it's a relevant bump related to recent events.

Irontaco wrote:Hey you guys might be new to the forum, avoid posting in threads that may be a little too old, alright? Although, i'm going to consider it completely passable because it's a relevant bump related to recent events.

Not to mention almost every post you could make in this sub-forum is a bump.

I know not to bump, but since it was on topic I thought you guys wouldn't mind.

If you read the real proposal you'd know that SCP is actually faked.