Page 1 of 1

SCP-169 v SCP-682

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:57 pm
by SpadedNightmare
Two of the biggest and most dangerous SCPs going against each other.
I think it would be quite interesting to see them fight eachother. :shock:

We know not much about SCP-169 except the estimation of body length to be between 2000 and 8000 km.
SCP-682 has been indestructible no matter what, but isn't as big as SCP-169.
:682:

Re: SCP-169 v SCP-682

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:36 pm
by Omniary
Something about 169 deeply terrifies me, on a completely different level from 682. Throwing 682 into the ocean in hopes it'll commence battle with 169 sounds like it'd be asking for world destruction.

I'd personally like to imagine 682 would end up on a beach, completely gored and barely living, sorta like his original article picture of the beached beluga whale... Hmmm. :682:

Re: SCP-169 v SCP-682

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:55 am
by autotroph
Juicy wrote:In my opinion, SCP-682 is like "the thing that will eventually destroy the world", never underestimate its ability to adapt (both phisically and mentally) to any situation he faces.

I think there are two possibilities:

a) 682 would start consuming 169 and becoming bigger and bigger till it collapses? or just eats the world (bestest lizerd is strongestest lizerd).

b) -The most probable one- Both of them (especially 682) would end up heavily injured and giving up, ignoring each other.
Hmm... a) seems possible, although I think that it's highly unlikely 682 would do such a thing just for the sake of defeating 169. I think he'd be more intellectual than that. On the other hand, b) has a 90% chance of happening, since stalemate seems to tend to happen when dealing with SCPs basically fighting each other (in 682's case of course). 90% because I think 682's 'adaptability' does have a chance of being superior against 169, to the point that he can either kill 169 completely, or put it in a quasi-stasis or brain dead or something. But I don't think 682 would take action to kill 169 though: I think they'd just have an immensely long fight (like with 096), only to end up with both of them still standing while the world is ruined to oblivion.

Re: SCP-169 v SCP-682

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:47 pm
by MoreLikeInsert
169 v 682 is like a human fighting a fly that can change it's physiology, even at scp 682's maximum noted size.


It's much more likely that scp 682 would simply flee, and scp 169 wouldn't bother to follow.

Re: SCP-169 v SCP-682

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 3:09 pm
by TheAlmightyLoaf
What if SCP-169 ate SCP-682 but since SCP 682 is inside of SCP-169, SCP-682 would've physically destroyed SCP-169 but the probability of that happening is, probably 45/100