As stated by Insanity's Bane, I cannot read into your Awsomeguy mind and figure out the meanings behind your words. I have to take them at face value. Also telling someone that people will hate him and they want to destroy everything he does, as well as insulting them! I honestly think that your pathetic excuse is just a waste of bandwidth.

You and Commander were both at fault and no excuse can get either of you out of trouble, you both went out of your ways, more so Commander, to attack hug.

The charge stands as issued. I am considering this case closed.

Juicy wrote:Hug appears as banned in the list, you forgot to edit it

Thanks for point that out, fixed now.

Added another rule to the rules list, a rule which I fear haven't been made clear too much on here, regarding being banned for a set period of time and then trying to get around the ban.

Steelpoint can remove the rule from the rule list if he thinks so.

Sparks wrote:Added another rule to the rules list, a rule which I fear haven't been made clear too much on here, regarding being banned for a set period of time and then trying to get around the ban.

This is a good rule, I remember when SFK always tried to get around his ban.
+1 Respect

WhiteAce wrote:

Sparks wrote:Added another rule to the rules list, a rule which I fear haven't been made clear too much on here, regarding being banned for a set period of time and then trying to get around the ban.

This is a good rule, I remember when SFK always tried to get around his ban.
+1 Respect

I have been thinking of adding that rule to the list for a long time, to make it clear that when you have been issued set period ban, that means are not allowed to post on here in that period.

What made the cup flow over was a certain person with a gun as his profile picture, who tried to get on during his 24 hour ban.
His IP address gave him away, as well as his new profiles's picture and age and most of all his way of writing his posts.

I should note that circumventing a ban always had resulted in a perm ban, this is mentioned in the rule text. Though no harm in making it more explicit.

I am a new member to this forum, and my name is Henry fenald. Mostly I always stick to various forums to get information about various life experiences and to get updated. I was searching for a good forum and finally decided to make my favorite. I found this forum very informative and the members are very helping and also there are many interesting topics are discussed here.

Added one of the guide lines to the rules set, making it rule #8:
Dont post or bump on month old threads, make a new one instead.

Steelpoint is allowed to reverse this decision if he wants to, but I'm actually tired of seeing people not reading the rules and bringing 5 month old dead threads back to the front page.

1. Whats bad about bringing old pages back, it looked like it was gonna get talked on quite abit because 0.7.3 will probably have that option in.
2. Why is it Steelports plan if he can do that? Is it his forum. Well its not Regalis's so yeah.

For starters this forum is owned by Regalis and not myself, I am an Admin alongside Regalis but that is it.

Also I agree that bumping old month old topics should be against the rules, I can handle exceptions in the case of Stickyed threads and the like on a case by case basis, but as Sparks said it has become somewhat common for people to bump month old topics.