Again, it would be too many threads and it would be complete chaos. The way we are using now has worked all along, so we won't be changing it anytime soon.Xyteran wrote:That's the point.That way, each post can be considered individually, and discussed, without holding things up.
When some one is banned, its not because of a mistake.The Radical Larry wrote:Umm. if someone is banned, how do they send a pm if it was a mistake?
Not that ill cause trouble
RADYCAL LARREEYThe Radical Larry wrote:Umm. if someone is banned, how do they send a pm if it was a mistake?
Not that ill cause trouble
Unless regarding SCPs. Wat, there's actually SCP porn?Steelpoint wrote:*UPDATE*
Striked out the mini-rule regarding the old "Screw Around Forum", also reworded the "No Pornography" rule slightly.
682 on top of Iris.Destructoid wrote:Unless regarding SCPs. Wat, there's actually SCP porn?Steelpoint wrote:*UPDATE*
Striked out the mini-rule regarding the old "Screw Around Forum", also reworded the "No Pornography" rule slightly.
*Goes to rule34.
