Undertow Games Forum

Xyteran wrote:That's the point. That way, each post can be considered individually, and discussed, without holding things up.

Again, it would be too many threads and it would be complete chaos. The way we are using now has worked all along, so we won't be changing it anytime soon.

Umm. if someone is banned, how do they send a pm if it was a mistake?
Not that ill cause trouble

The Radical Larry wrote:Umm. if someone is banned, how do they send a pm if it was a mistake?
Not that ill cause trouble

When some one is banned, its not because of a mistake.

The Radical Larry wrote:Umm. if someone is banned, how do they send a pm if it was a mistake?
Not that ill cause trouble

RADYCAL LARREEY

*UPDATE*

Striked out the mini-rule regarding the old "Screw Around Forum", also reworded the "No Pornography" rule slightly.

Steelpoint wrote:*UPDATE*

Striked out the mini-rule regarding the old "Screw Around Forum", also reworded the "No Pornography" rule slightly.

Unless regarding SCPs. Wat, there's actually SCP porn?

*Goes to rule34.

Destructoid wrote:

Steelpoint wrote:*UPDATE*

Striked out the mini-rule regarding the old "Screw Around Forum", also reworded the "No Pornography" rule slightly.

Unless regarding SCPs. Wat, there's actually SCP porn?

*Goes to rule34.

682 on top of Iris.
Cannot unsee.

I meant that rule if any SCP is by description naked, like a statue.

Also of course there is Rule 34 on SCP.

A warning has been issued to The Rake for several posts on the MLP mod thread and another off topic thread.

What about SCP-173?