Undertow Games Forum

Awesomeguy147 wrote:1.) When I said "burn it now" that was the response to the NSFW pictures that commanderpro100 put on the wiki, the sentence had nothing to do with hug.

Commander wasn't the one who added porn to the wiki, just so you know.

Proof: Considering that he already had an account, why would he make another to post said porn? There'd be no need.

Insanity's Bane wrote:

Awesomeguy147 wrote:1.) When I said "burn it now" that was the response to the NSFW pictures that commanderpro100 put on the wiki, the sentence had nothing to do with hug.

Commander wasn't the one who added porn to the wiki, just so you know.

Proof: Considering that he already had an account, why would he make another to post said porn? There'd be no need.

He was the only one that I knew trolled said wiki, so I assumed, either way the statement still stands that I was talking about the porn, not hug.

Sorry. But expecting everyone else to read into your comments the way you feel is... appropriate? is wishful thinking.
Although Commander was far worse, you weren't that far behind from what I had seen.

As stated by Insanity's Bane, I cannot read into your Awsomeguy mind and figure out the meanings behind your words. I have to take them at face value. Also telling someone that people will hate him and they want to destroy everything he does, as well as insulting them! I honestly think that your pathetic excuse is just a waste of bandwidth.

You and Commander were both at fault and no excuse can get either of you out of trouble, you both went out of your ways, more so Commander, to attack hug.

The charge stands as issued. I am considering this case closed.

Hug appears as banned in the list, you forgot to edit it

Juicy wrote:Hug appears as banned in the list, you forgot to edit it

Thanks for point that out, fixed now.

Added another rule to the rules list, a rule which I fear haven't been made clear too much on here, regarding being banned for a set period of time and then trying to get around the ban.

Steelpoint can remove the rule from the rule list if he thinks so.

Sparks wrote:Added another rule to the rules list, a rule which I fear haven't been made clear too much on here, regarding being banned for a set period of time and then trying to get around the ban.

This is a good rule, I remember when SFK always tried to get around his ban.
+1 Respect

WhiteAce wrote:

Sparks wrote:Added another rule to the rules list, a rule which I fear haven't been made clear too much on here, regarding being banned for a set period of time and then trying to get around the ban.

This is a good rule, I remember when SFK always tried to get around his ban.
+1 Respect

I have been thinking of adding that rule to the list for a long time, to make it clear that when you have been issued set period ban, that means are not allowed to post on here in that period.

What made the cup flow over was a certain person with a gun as his profile picture, who tried to get on during his 24 hour ban.
His IP address gave him away, as well as his new profiles's picture and age and most of all his way of writing his posts.

I should note that circumventing a ban always had resulted in a perm ban, this is mentioned in the rule text. Though no harm in making it more explicit.