Page 13 of 22
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:16 pm
by The Red Menace
Juicy wrote:Crowbar wrote:I'd like to think that I'm a pretty decent bloke, and I think Regalis should be applauded for bringing life to SCP:CB, but sometimes I think some of the fan-base are very superfluous and ungrateful at times. Regalis puts alot of work into Containment Breach and I doubt he get's much money from it, he doesn't owe anyone anything and I wish the, thankfully, minority who are vocal about what they want and not their gratitude would see that.
He isn't getting any money at all
Not true, the few kind souls that donate. I don't know the sum that he has accumulated but hopefully someone has donated.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:30 pm
by Glitch
Juicy wrote:Glitch wrote:Z-Bites wrote:@Insanity's post- Sometimes I just hate the game's fanbase....
682 wins? Typical..
682 has to be the most over-rated SCP on the wiki.
And Dr. Clef's proposal for 001 is another one.
Ugh, Agreed.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:41 pm
by Insanity's Bane
Before this drags off topic yet again, 682 was unanimously agreed to never be put on a poll again. So y'know.
Also, remember, signing up for wiki is easy as all Hell so if you want to come on the chat, please do. We talk about... stuff. /shamelesspromotion
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:24 pm
by Daniel123Shaw123
Of course SCP-682 will be the most liked, its been in the game for a very long time but has not really made and appearance. A random encounter regarding SCP-682 would be good where he puts his tail or claw threw a wall or a few dead bodies in SCP-682's chamber.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:28 pm
by Ltn Vasquez
Daniel123Shaw123 wrote:Of course SCP-682 will be the most liked, its been in the game for a very long time but has not really made and appearance. A random encounter regarding SCP-682 would be good where he puts his tail or claw threw a wall or a few dead bodies in SCP-682's chamber.
Doesn't anybody remember the older versions of SCP? SCP-173 had a huge polygon count that slowed down the whole game. Just imagine, a massive monster, now that would stop the game completely. Perhaps in the future.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:38 pm
by MonocleBios
Ltn Vasquez wrote:
Doesn't anybody remember the older versions of SCP? SCP-173 had a huge polygon count that slowed down the whole game for people with on-board graphics cards. Just imagine, a massive monster, now that would stop the game completely for said people. Perhaps in the future.
FTFY
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:45 pm
by The Red Menace
Ltn Vasquez wrote:Daniel123Shaw123 wrote:Of course SCP-682 will be the most liked, its been in the game for a very long time but has not really made and appearance. A random encounter regarding SCP-682 would be good where he puts his tail or claw threw a wall or a few dead bodies in SCP-682's chamber.
Doesn't anybody remember the older versions of SCP? SCP-173 had a huge polygon count that slowed down the whole game. Just imagine, a massive monster, now that would stop the game completely. Perhaps in the future.
Yeah I can barely add any new sound files without getting a memory access violation.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:48 pm
by Ltn Vasquez
The Red Menace wrote:Ltn Vasquez wrote:Daniel123Shaw123 wrote:Of course SCP-682 will be the most liked, its been in the game for a very long time but has not really made and appearance. A random encounter regarding SCP-682 would be good where he puts his tail or claw threw a wall or a few dead bodies in SCP-682's chamber.
Doesn't anybody remember the older versions of SCP? SCP-173 had a huge polygon count that slowed down the whole game. Just imagine, a massive monster, now that would stop the game completely. Perhaps in the future.
Yeah I can barely add any new sound files without getting a memory access violation.
Hence a new game engine, which I want to do.
Hence my inexperience.
Damn, this sucks.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:50 pm
by The Red Menace
Ltn Vasquez wrote:
Hence a new game engine, which I want to do.
Hence my inexperience.
Damn, this sucks.
Well like I said, I have been making very slow progress, rate in which I will finish, if I work the way I am currently working, I would be done possibly the fall of 2014.
Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:55 pm
by hug0905
that wasn't me saying why did you ban me from the chat, i promise you that wasn't me asking that at all.
