We've had those for 4 years.yonzo_rikuo wrote:you should put people should advise a user to stop doing their annoying behaviour
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 25/07/2015]
#102well ok thenCLgaming wrote:We've had those for 4 years.yonzo_rikuo wrote:you should put people should advise a user to stop doing their annoying behaviour
Furries and FnaF fan must be terminated to avoid incident-[REDACTED]
- DR.Yonzo
- DR.Yonzo
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 25/07/2015]
#103So I was wondering if there could be an implementation of a rule regarding this, there was some issues we had on the old forums and it just reminded me of this, maybe we should add countermeasures for this?
My response to this:
Mandatory blank signature, here.
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 14/12/2015]
#105I can't recall too well, uh... I think he was immature and tended to make trouble then he got banned for it.Jebus wrote:May i ask why combine was banned/pardoned?
Later he asked for a pardon in a good way, and turned out to be a pretty chill dude.
By the way, i updated some things in the rules.
The rules wrote:[UPDATED 01/08/2016] You will not be subject to the tier system if you are found to be breaking rules continuously regardless of the warning of fellow users and/or moderators, in these cases a permanent ban will be applied if the user is found to be unwilling to cooperate.
sup
roger copy bravo tango mango
roger copy bravo tango mango
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 01/08/2016]
#106Any chance of the maximum avatar size being upped anytime soon? 90x90 is incredibly small.
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 01/08/2016]
#107Considering the comments some can make, 90 x 90 is not really that small. Large avatars just distract from the posts and makes pages load slower on mobile (same deal with huge signatures).Jebus wrote:Any chance of the maximum avatar size being upped anytime soon? 90x90 is incredibly small.
So probably not.
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 01/08/2016]
#108I understand this but compared to every other forum 90x90 is tiny, You cant fit most images into it. The forum also doesnt have a auto downscale feature so you gotta manually crop and downscale the image.KirbyMario12345 wrote:Considering the comments some can make, 90 x 90 is not really that small. Large avatars just distract from the posts and makes pages load slower on mobile (same deal with huge signatures).Jebus wrote:Any chance of the maximum avatar size being upped anytime soon? 90x90 is incredibly small.
So probably not.
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 01/08/2016]
#109Yes it does. When you add an avatar you can manually the set the size you want the image to be in the field below the URL, so just set it to 90x90 and you're good.Jebus wrote:The forum also doesnt have a auto downscale feature so you gotta manually crop and downscale the image.
While I personally think that the limit on avatars should be increased to 100x100, I don't see why it matters that much.Jebus wrote:I understand this but compared to every other forum 90x90 is tiny, You cant fit most images into it.
Re: [--READ--] Forum Rules [UPDATED 01/08/2016]
#110Curious: Are said permanent bans IP bans? Or just account bans?
𝙱𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚣𝟹𝙳 𝙴𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚛(!): 𝙿𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚞𝚝𝚝𝚘𝚗 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚐𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛.