Page 3 of 4

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:01 pm
by SCP 513
Omniary wrote:
SCP 513 wrote: InnocentSam pretended to be SCP-079 and annoyed me. That's why I accidentally de-railled the thread because of him, so he wanted to go off-topic.
Yeah, let's just say you weren't obligated to post off-topic all because of InnocentSam, everyone involved was equally responsible for their own post, so there's no need to go blame him for it.

Also, as a note, I'm going to try much harder to take the off-topic issue a lot more seriously.
Like i said:
Spoiler
I am sorry.

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:08 am
by rarityismahwaifu
Above is prob virus. I can smell it.
Well that or this beer can full of diesel.
Why do I still have this?

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:05 pm
by Daiguey
I don't know if you have realized this, but I don't think the containment breach was an accident, for example the remote door controls were switched on prior to the containment breach giving SCP-079 wireless access to the door controls, another thing I notice is in Dr. Maynard's office there is a power log showing unauthorized access to the containment power supplies releasing SCP-106

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:08 pm
by spartan322
Daiguey wrote:I don't know if you have realized this, but I don't think the containment breach was an accident, for example the remote door controls were switched on prior to the containment breach giving SCP-079 wireless access to the door controls, another thing I notice is in Dr. Maynard's office there is a power log showing unauthorized access to the containment power supplies releasing SCP-106
Wrong thread dude.

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:29 pm
by Daiguey
spartan322 wrote:
Daiguey wrote:I don't know if you have realized this, but I don't think the containment breach was an accident, for example the remote door controls were switched on prior to the containment breach giving SCP-079 wireless access to the door controls, another thing I notice is in Dr. Maynard's office there is a power log showing unauthorized access to the containment power supplies releasing SCP-106
Wrong thread dude.
sorry where do I put this :sad:

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:18 am
by shevan90
is it possible they add scp 191 to containment breach?

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:28 am
by Insanity's Bane
shevan90 wrote:is it possible they add scp 191 to containment breach?
This isn't the right place to ask that. Please refer to this thread.

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:18 pm
by SCP-Sean
Hey, i just wanted to say, i think that when 513 gets re-added, he should have 096's placeholder model, and i made a brilliant texture, if you want to see a snapshot, tell me. :) :106: :shock:

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:12 pm
by Omniary
SCP-Sean wrote:Hey, i just wanted to say, i think that when 513 gets re-added, he should have 096's placeholder model, and i made a brilliant texture, if you want to see a snapshot, tell me. :) :106: :shock:
That's nice and all, and I think you should post it, but this isn't the place. This is actually a very ironic place to post that.

You can showcase it in the Collaboration forum.

Re: Off topic discussions problem.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 1:54 am
by Ltn Vasquez
Wow, that was 1, 2... 3 instances of new users trying to derail this thread. I thought the title of this thread would be enough to ward off people suggesting stuff.

Anyways, back on topic, this thread doesn't really need discussion, in fact this was addressed already. Mods need to step up there game and other users need to stop going off topic. That's it. What else is there to discuss?