Page 2 of 9

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:24 am
by Z-Bites
ThePotaterGamer wrote:If anything 372 should go, after all it doesnt scare most of us.
This is kind of one of the reasons why I'd consider taking 372 out. It doesn't seem to come close to what 513-1 does to players when it stalks them.

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:46 am
by Omniary
That's probably because most people haven't encountered him often. 372 has managed to get some really good jumps out of me, in the very few times I see him.

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:20 am
by ThePotaterGamer
Z-Bites wrote:
ThePotaterGamer wrote:If anything 372 should go, after all it doesnt scare most of us.
This is kind of one of the reasons why I'd consider taking 372 out. It doesn't seem to come close to what 513-1 does to players when it stalks them.
THANK YOU ANOTHER PERSON TO SUPPORT MY THOUGHT

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 6:05 am
by Serimah
Well, gameplay-wise it's true that we now have two stalkers. But given that most players who don't play the game as thorough as most of us do, it IS possible to miss either 372 or 513.
Then you'd have no Stalker at all.
372 was added when 513 was removed, true. But why not remove 895 then? We have 012 that kills if you stare at it (Yes, I'm stretching it a little with the monitors but the overall idea is very similiar).
I remember many of you complaining about not enough SCPs in the game and now you already want to start removing some?

I guess 372 could be removed yeah, but at the same time I'd also suggest to think of other future SCPs for the game ;) Fresh ideas that can be discussed to the death.
Why not finally consider 860?

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:51 am
by ThePotaterGamer
860 would be nice....isnt it planned?

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:00 am
by Trialtrex21
Well, when 513 was removed, people got butthurt and wanted him back. Based on this, I suspect that people will do the same thing if 372 is removed. He has sort of grown on me anyway, like he's part of the family.

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:37 am
by SCP 513
No. I do not agree about 372 removal. And 513 will not be removed. I don't see any reasons. It's just is that 372 needs improvements and 513 is good for now that I also see it needs a better, much ghostlier model.

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:35 pm
by That Same Anon
SCP 513 wrote:that I also see it needs a better, much ghostlier model.
I think 096's model fits quite well. A bit of Depth of Field blur (if possible) would be pretty cool when seeing 513

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 6:47 pm
by ThePotaterGamer
:173: :106: :096: Just realized we had these xD

Re: Removal of 372.

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:58 pm
by That Same Anon
ThePotaterGamer wrote::173: :106: :096: Just realized we had these xD
Lovely offtopic, m8


anyway


what I mean by depth of field blur is to, well, literally BLUR everything. Not motion blur, but low quality blur.