Page 1 of 3
Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:35 pm
by Niikiitaa03
Hello everyone.
You know that Gate A now have another ending. Unfortunately, it's hard for me to understand what he is talking about. So, can you give me a text of the endingA2? Thanks.
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:59 pm
by sumogypsyfish
There's another ending? When I tried playing I made it through a lockroom and a couple of hallways before I got a MAV (right before that I heard footsteps and the elevator sound).
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:04 pm
by Niikiitaa03
sumogypsyfish wrote:There's another ending? When I tried playing I made it through a lockroom and a couple of hallways before I got a MAV (right before that I heard footsteps and the elevator sound).
Use
this bugfix.
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:09 pm
by sumogypsyfish
Awesome. But seriously, there's a second gate A ending?
EDIT: I found the file but the computer I'm using can't play it
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:23 pm
by Niikiitaa03
sumogypsyfish wrote:Awesome. But seriously, there's a second gate A ending?
Yep. Contain 106 and go to Gate A. And you will get another ending.
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:25 pm
by sumogypsyfish
when I get to my computer I'll try listening to it
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 1:54 am
by Omniary
" *log start* Testing *indecipherable* ███. Subject ███. Subject demonstrates extraordinary luck and complete mastery of even the most fatal of circumstances and an uncanny ability to predict even the most unpredictable of hazards, almost as if it has performed these impossible tasks several times before. Further testing is required to determine whether the subject should receive SCP classification. *log end* "
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:05 am
by CommanderMark
Omniary wrote:" *log start* Testing *indecipherable* ███. Subject ███. Subject demonstrates extraordinary luck and complete mastery of even the most fatal of circumstances and an uncanny ability to predict even the most unpredictable of hazards, almost as if it has performed these impossible tasks several times before. Further testing is required to determine whether the subject should receive SCP classification. *log end* "
.....you have got to be kidding me. That's got to be the most stupidest ending by far.
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:09 am
by Omniary
CommanderPro100 wrote:Omniary wrote:" *log start* Testing *indecipherable* ███. Subject ███. Subject demonstrates extraordinary luck and complete mastery of even the most fatal of circumstances and an uncanny ability to predict even the most unpredictable of hazards, almost as if it has performed these impossible tasks several times before. Further testing is required to determine whether the subject should receive SCP classification. *log end* "
.....you have got to be kidding me. That's got to be the most stupidest ending by far.
The idea's been out there before any of the other endings actually, here's where it seemed to have originated :
http://z13.invisionfree.com/Regalis/ind ... owtopic=29
I personally like it in a way, it's a good ending considering the fact that it's not the ideal one, it's just an ending that replaces the buggy Gate A end when you contain 106.
Re: Gate A Ending 2 Text request
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:51 pm
by CLgaming
CommanderPro100 wrote:Omniary wrote:" *log start* Testing *indecipherable* ███. Subject ███. Subject demonstrates extraordinary luck and complete mastery of even the most fatal of circumstances and an uncanny ability to predict even the most unpredictable of hazards, almost as if it has performed these impossible tasks several times before. Further testing is required to determine whether the subject should receive SCP classification. *log end* "
.....you have got to be kidding me. That's got to be the most stupidest ending by far.
Well my friend, I think so too. But they may have said that because no-one expected a simple Class-D to make it out of the facility with pure instinct. I'm sure they have learned the error of their hypothesis afterwards.