Re: 1.0 Update?
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:17 am
I have been waiting for this moment.
I feel soooo![[DATA EXPUNGED] :EXPUNGED:](./images/smilies/90vU5WJ.png)
I feel soooo
It really depends on the scale of what he wants to make and what he's comfortable with IMO. I think most people know my opinion of B3D by now so I'll refrain from boring you all.Akatos wrote:Are you planning to use Blitz3D for the next project or rather an other engine? Maybe it's a bit too early to ask that, though.
Nope, I won't be using Blitz3D anymore. I've been looking into Unity, but I'm not really a fan of the component-based architecture (I guess I could get used to it after a while...) and I'm worried that some of the features I've planned for the game (lots of procedurally generated content and possibly online multiplayer) might prove to be too tedious to achieve with Unity. So now I'm leaning towards writing my own engine using C# and probably Monogame + some other libraries.Akatos wrote:Are you planning to use Blitz3D for the next project or rather an other engine? Maybe it's a bit too early to ask that, though.
Sorry but there won't be any major changes/additions to the pocket dimension. The only difference is that now the probability of getting teleported out of there is slightly higher.pichapie wrote:was wondering if ever in the 1.0 update, they fix the pocket dimension a bit
Lua script engine Lua script engine Lua script engine Lua script engine Lua script engineRegalis wrote:So now I'm leaning towards writing my own engine using C# and probably Monogame + some other libraries.
Interesting......Regalis wrote:Nope, I won't be using Blitz3D anymore. I've been looking into Unity, but I'm not really a fan of the component-based architecture (I guess I could get used to it after a while...) and I'm worried that some of the features I've planned for the game (lots of procedurally generated content and possibly online multiplayer) might prove to be too tedious to achieve with Unity. So now I'm leaning towards writing my own engine using C# and probably Monogame + some other libraries.Akatos wrote:Are you planning to use Blitz3D for the next project or rather an other engine? Maybe it's a bit too early to ask that, though.

Welcome to the club!Regalis wrote:I've been looking into Unity, but I'm not really a fan of the component-based architecture.
I'm interested in how you write games in OOP languages; especially since that was one of my biggest problems with Blitz. Though, that's because I hate procedural languages that aren't C.So now I'm leaning towards writing my own engine using C# and probably Monogame + some other libraries.
Lua is probably best, it has arguably the easiest wrappers to use.InnocentSam wrote:Lua is just a personal preference of script language but any works
Good enoughRegalis wrote:Sorry but there won't be any major changes/additions to the pocket dimension. The only difference is that now the probability of getting teleported out of there is slightly higher.pichapie wrote:was wondering if ever in the 1.0 update, they fix the pocket dimension a bit
Reg3DRegalis wrote:So now I'm leaning towards writing my own engine using C#