Re: I just noticed that SCP-1025 model and texture is wrong.
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 10:03 pm
Spoiler
The book has more than one edition. You weren't wrong... but you weren't really right either, if that makes sense.
https://undertowgames.com/forum/
It does, and I am aware of this. The first is the standard edition. The one that was widely available. Not exactly sure what the "DELUXE" edition covers. Brain surgery maybe? How to summon Cthulhu to a snotty child into behaving like a . We just don't know.Awesomeguy147 wrote:The book has more than one edition. You weren't wrong... but you weren't really right either, if that makes sense.
Gabriel Jade mentioned it on 049's discussion page. [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-203252/ ... st-2129717]Ninjabuntu wrote: -shortened-
Huh that is intresting. Thank you for that.Olivine wrote:Gabriel Jade mentioned it on 049's discussion page. [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-203252/ ... st-2129717]
And again, My Counterpoint is:Olivine wrote:The point is, 079 doesn't have an avatar.
Glad to help.Olivine wrote:I acknowledge your correction about 106 haha.
Not going there in this thread other then to say. The photo of SCP-173 on the wiki was not Izumi Kato's to giver permission for. and that he can't claim right to anything inspired by that or any other photos. Even his own Sculpture. If the Photo where to be dropped, even though it was not his to grant or decline permission, Izumi Kato's claim to legal actions if used commercially is able to be fought.Olivine wrote:Izumi Kato said that SCP-173 shouldn't be commercialized, btw.
Noted. Just pointing out a few counterpoints of my own, and a few minor holes in your own points. No big deal. Just sharing information is all.Olivine wrote:I think you completely missed the point I've been simple saying; it's not so important here. Compelled as you will, that is completely fine with me.