Page 2 of 2

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:38 pm
by Hahmonen
Zarpox wrote:
Hahmonen wrote:Not actually, but i remember it as the "never crashing" version, not sure anymore because it was on an old computer that has better support for old stuff like this.
I understand what you mean, that version was around for a while, but I just played it for a few minutes again now and it does have it's fair share of bugs that some people may have forgotten about.
Well, as the hardware and software keep going away from supporting this old software, it's possible that there is bugs that weren't there before.

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:05 pm
by Zarpox
Hahmonen wrote:Well, as the hardware and software keep going away from supporting this old software, it's possible that there is bugs that weren't there before.
Who knows? But in this case, playing 1.3 on an old pc should still be better then, and to have a fair comparison to older versions like 0.6.6.
LORD DEATH wrote:I'm sure that with every new item implemented, the bug squashing gets significantly harder.
I can imagine it does. But like, what is more important? More content or less bugs? At this point, less bugs of course. And by that logic, you can just play the earlier versions to get fewer bugs but less stuff to do? Anyway, I still really like the game, no matter what version.

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:11 pm
by HIS. DICC.
oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:14 pm
by Cridone
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
THAT'S DEPLORABLE AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:26 pm
by AveryLP
Cridone wrote:
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
THAT'S DEPLORABLE AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED
Lol, look at that guy''s (HIS. DICC.) location and occupation.

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:13 am
by Sic
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
Spoiler
Image

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:17 am
by LORD DEATH
:laugh:
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:19 am
by LORD DEATH
LORD DEATH wrote:
HIS. DICC. wrote:oh my god this game is so unoptimized blur blur it muts be super optimized cause battlefield 2 is my fav game which is optimizzed did i menton optimizing cbr????
Whaaaat? (Laughing while typing) Uhm.....K? :laugh:
In all honesty this guy is kind of funny.
Edit: Oops. Looks like I accidentally double posted. Is it possible to delete this?

Re: A focus on stability?

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:36 am
by InnocentSam
Frankly it depends on the users. I used to use Zoho for bug tracking, and asked users to report bugs using a provided template. The bug tracker allowed me to chomp through bugs, but it was largely my own reported/noted bugs on the list, and very few ones were reported by users.

Point being that given a comprehensive list of known bugs, it's a lot easier to provide stability to the software than just blindly "optimising code" in the hopes that it fixes bugs.