Page 45 of 46

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:22 pm
by SCP-Sean
maybey have a dead class-D in 513's chamber

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:28 pm
by D-9999
THAR IZ NU CANON!!!!!!11111ONEONEONE

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:35 pm
by Zarpox
Over one year has passed, SCP Containment Breach... I Love You.
Let us just have a break and look at things... go back.. into memories.. nostalgia.
How everything has changed, how everything has developed.

The legendary SCP-513 moment...
Last year, early May:
[youtube]ujL2siZaOzI[/youtube]

And what is now? One year later?
http://youtu.be/qwly4JZtoMk?t=2m12s
Skipped version (because the beginning has Dr. L spoilers)

Re: SCP-513 Implementation and Modelling.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:28 pm
by SCP 5968
zombarg wrote:@Juicy
Oh my god... i told you I'm not 513. I explained everything in my thread.
Now stop talking about him or he would possibly stalk the forums and see that he is the stupid one. Don't make him that. He will possibly never forgive.

Also... please stcky this up. Regalis will think if he adds 513 into game.
this "new" model for 513-1 is NOT a new model at all... it's a SLIGHTLY EDITED VERSION OF SCP-096's OLD MODEL... WTF IS UP WITH THAT?!

Re: SCP-513 Implementation and Modelling.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:32 pm
by Brunou8
SCP 5968 wrote:
zombarg wrote:@Juicy
Oh my god... i told you I'm not 513. I explained everything in my thread.
Now stop talking about him or he would possibly stalk the forums and see that he is the stupid one. Don't make him that. He will possibly never forgive.

Also... please stcky this up. Regalis will think if he adds 513 into game.
this "new" model for 513-1 is NOT a new model at all... it's a SLIGHTLY EDITED VERSION OF SCP-096's OLD MODEL... WTF IS UP WITH THAT?!
We all know that ¬¬

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:32 pm
by SCP 513
What is wrong with you? That‘s a very old post you replied, which was my fake acc. Check the date. And also, no fucking shit you said.

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:18 pm
by Cridone
@Guy who can't turn off /the caps
Why do we NEED a new model exactly? I'm pretty sure no one wants to make a new model from scratch for a SCP like this.

God, it feels like I'm doing the whole 372 model speech all over again. :096:

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 10:26 pm
by Serimah
SCP 513 wrote:What is wrong with you? That‘s a very old post you replied, which was my fake acc. Check the date. And also, no fucking shit you said.

Well by now we should all know that the walking mary-sue is just stating the obvious or making generally painful to read comments.
Also, I do think 513-1 deserves his own model if he's to remain in the game. Let's face it.. once you know you're looking at a diffrently textured old 096 you'll always end up staring at his durrrrrrr face.
Or his ass... but that maybe just me.

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:34 pm
by Brunou8
Serimah wrote: Also, I do think 513-1 deserves his own model if he's to remain in the game. Let's face it.. once you know you're looking at a diffrently textured old 096 you'll always end up staring at his durrrrrrr face.
Or his ass... but that maybe just me.
I agree, but this model was a "express model", right? the same happened with SCP-096.

Re: SCP-513

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:58 pm
by Cridone
Gogert made a skeleton model. (though, mark told me her models are crap)

So maybe we can use that and put Nights 513-1 head on it?