Page 6 of 12

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:41 pm
by MrJPenguin1
Wow, a simple concept art made all of this? Dang, you guys must really hate his work. I like it as it's a twist, but like 3 billion other people have, it's not canon.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:41 pm
by mrpeanut188
MrJPenguin1 wrote:Wow, a simple concept art made all of this? Dang, you guys must really hate his work. I like it as it's a twist, but like 3 billion other people have, it's not canon.
Costa, you'd make good art for a new scp. I was planning to take 232, but I was rejected all 12 times for membership on the official wiki. I cannot fit an application in 200 words.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:03 pm
by Awesomeguy147
mrpeanut188 wrote:
MrJPenguin1 wrote:Wow, a simple concept art made all of this? Dang, you guys must really hate his work. I like it as it's a twist, but like 3 billion other people have, it's not canon.
Costa, you'd make good art for a new scp. I was planning to take 232, but I was rejected all 12 times for membership on the official wiki. I cannot fit an application in 200 words.
Really because it seems that most applications are extremely short

For examples: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/badapplications

Of course these are bad applications, but they are all about the same length.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:23 pm
by CostaRic
Regalis wrote:I like it, but as said, I'm trying to keep the game as canon as possible.

Also, I'm not Geogmz. My nick in the SCPCB wiki is Regalis11.
Aaaand that will make everything a bit more complicated to explain... So Geozmg is the founder of the wikia and you are the founder of the actual game? Am I getting it right?

And maybe I don't fully understand the word "canon", would that be keeping it as the original characters without changing them right?
chris0matic wrote:Oh, my fucking god. I hate to get upset about this. But im letting it out.



Ahem, Your work isnt going to be put ingame. It looks horrible, The fact that your trying to make 173 Look like a alien is clearly stupid. Its staying the way it is and there is nothing you will do about it. Now Get over it and stop Trying to get chances. Its Not happening, Got it?
Well, that was certainly uncalled for, I never asked my work to be placed into the game, you clearly don't understand what "concept art" means to an artist do you?

Mod Edit: Another offending Double Post.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:30 pm
by mrpeanut188
CostaRic wrote: And maybe I don't fully understand the word "canon", would that be keeping it as the original characters without changing them right?

STOP RITE THAR!
KNOW THE RISK IN THIS LINK, IT LINKS TO LET ME GOOGLE THAT FOR YOU, AND THE ADS ARE BEING REPORTED AS MALWARE.
BE WARNED.
:( :( :( :( :(
http://bit.ly/MTh4jO

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:34 pm
by chris0matic
mrpeanut188 wrote:
CostaRic wrote: And maybe I don't fully understand the word "canon", would that be keeping it as the original characters without changing them right?
http://bit.ly/MTh4jO
Good one Mr. Troll.

And costa You requested and Insisted about adding this ingame multiple times.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:41 pm
by CostaRic
I had already done that, what I understood was: A general law, rule, principle, or criterion by which something is judged.

And Ragalis said "as canon as possible", that, in my mind, counts for: it doesn't necessarily have to follow the general law, rule, principle, or criterion by which something is judged.

As I said, I tend to take things a bit too literal some times, and I should repeat myself for the hundred time, I'm gonna try to remake VISUALLY(not the story, not the character itself, just the visual effects that are INTO the game, or that would be if possible into the game whatsoever).

Now, for those who keep saying my art is shit, do your research first, I did it as a quick picture because is what I saw into the game, this is based completely visual on the game, and by that time I haven't yet read any SCP's info, I thought he was an alien, and that (IMO) is a simple miss-conception.

Damn guys, don't take it so seriously, is not like I depict him as a hermaphrodite or anything that is actually hateful on irrespectful towards 173 or hes creator...

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:33 am
by Awesomeguy147
mrpeanut188 wrote:
CostaRic wrote: And maybe I don't fully understand the word "canon", would that be keeping it as the original characters without changing them right?
http://bit.ly/MTh4jO
Malware... You just posted malware.... not only that, but you use google.... I think a murder is in order.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:00 pm
by MrJPenguin1
I believe what Regalis means by it being canon is that he want's it to stay a statue. Even the SCP Foundation states that it is a statue and that's about as canon as it can get. It's a statue, not an alien. And besides, no-one wants it to be what you made, it's to stay a statue unless what you drew is a statue.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:58 pm
by CostaRic
MrJPenguin1 wrote:I believe what Regalis means by it being canon is that he want's it to stay a statue. Even the SCP Foundation states that it is a statue and that's about as canon as it can get. It's a statue, not an alien. And besides, no-one wants it to be what you made, it's to stay a statue unless what you drew is a statue.
I never said it was an alien did I? Have you read the whole post?