Re: Virtual Reality??? (No. NOT Oculus Rift.)

#14
Who the :REDACTED: wants to buy an expensive headset like that? Oculus is the only good headset thats coming out and this seems like a stupid copy of it. It hasnt even come out yet and I bet there isnt even a stable dev kit of it yet, probably just some worthless idea. Plus, why would someone want this instead of oculus vr? Theres going to be no support for this, and I bet the eye movement will be glitchy as hell. This is just no. Just because it has eye tracking doesnt mean its perfect for a game like this
Image

Re: Virtual Reality??? (No. NOT Oculus Rift.)

#15
chris0matic wrote:Who the :REDACTED: wants to buy an expensive headset like that? Oculus is the only good headset thats coming out and this seems like a stupid copy of it. It hasnt even come out yet and I bet there isnt even a stable dev kit of it yet, probably just some worthless idea. Plus, why would someone want this instead of oculus vr? Theres going to be no support for this, and I bet the eye movement will be glitchy as hell. This is just no. Just because it has eye tracking doesnt mean its perfect for a game like this
There is this thing called "Development" and "Innovation".
It is basically like saying that "Counter Strike" copied "Call of Duty".
Besides, Oculus still have their bugs. They started earlier. Don't expect this VR Headset to complete earlier without bugs.

Re: Virtual Reality??? (No. NOT Oculus Rift.)

#19
Damn these occulus fans...

The Occulus isn't the first VR headset. Look up the VR boom from something like the 1970s...
It's also pretty crap. Seriously. I mean, it's not bad, it's just mainstream and idolized. That, my friends, is why many better products never get past prototyping.

Also, about having a vest that has pressure... (gizmos?) inside it to make you feel touched by in-game entities? Guess what! It's already been made before! Yes, for something like the old SEGA console! Wow!

And about people who don't know how things work and still say do this, do that... I agree with InnocentSam. I, myself, developing games know for a fact it can be very hard and annoying to do one small thing.

But I'm not bashing you guys, I'm just saying. Sorry if I offended anyone! This is more of a factual comment to fill you guys in on the... topic.
My YouTube account: https://www.youtube.com/user/BoltBarkingatthemoon
I know my avatar isn't exactly 'creative'. It's mostly so bronies can identify it but non-bronies have no idea.

Re: Virtual Reality??? (No. NOT Oculus Rift.)

#20
WillWow_mc wrote:Damn these occulus fans...

The Occulus isn't the first VR headset. Look up the VR boom from something like the 1970s...
It's also pretty crap. Seriously. I mean, it's not bad, it's just mainstream and idolized. That, my friends, is why many better products never get past prototyping.

Also, about having a vest that has pressure... (gizmos?) inside it to make you feel touched by in-game entities? Guess what! It's already been made before! Yes, for something like the old SEGA console! Wow!

And about people who don't know how things work and still say do this, do that... I agree with InnocentSam. I, myself, developing games know for a fact it can be very hard and annoying to do one small thing.

But I'm not bashing you guys, I'm just saying. Sorry if I offended anyone! This is more of a factual comment to fill you guys in on the... topic.
If you don't mean to offend anyone then you shouldn't put all this unnecessary sarcasm and the "Damn these occulus fans..". You just end up coming off as obnoxious.
eric