Re: [1.2.3] Scp-079 M.A.V and Gate A Glitch?

#11
Vane Brain wrote:
SyphenTV wrote: What was fixed? MAV's? Bullshit. The only things added were SFK's voice lines and Juanjpro's new AI additions for the MTF.
Spoiler
Image
Oshit he was off by what, two minor bug fixes?
Dmitriy-Bars wrote:If the endings can be deleted because they are shit... Have you any idea, what needs to be changed in them? Or maybe this game must be FULLY DELETED?
Dmitriy-Bars wrote:Seriously, what the hell is going on with you all?
Finish the game by yourself, if you can improve bugs better than those "stupid" developers. >:(
You know outside of the fact that this has well, no real relation to anything in this thread whatsoever, I still never bought the whole "if you don't like it do it yourself!" mentality. Since when does someone have to excel at a task they're criticizing someone else for doing poorly?

Seriously though, what does this have to do with anything? Syphen was complaining about how the endings suck holy shit Im an edgy small text man i'm so cool at hiding my true responses aren't I?and you're getting triggered over him apparently saying that they can't fix bugs.
PXLSHN wrote:-snip-
Way to shoehorn in some unrelated stuff about how great and fantastic your new update is.okay here's edgy small text I actually want you to read. my real response to this would simply be "political correctness ftw"

The moral of the story is that no one here can form proper arguments to save themselves. What was the start of this argument again? Oh right, Syphen complaining about how reaching Gate A works. How many responses/counter-arguments relate to it? Zero. gg guys

Re: [1.2.3] Scp-079 M.A.V and Gate A Glitch?

#12
CommanderPro100 wrote:
Vane Brain wrote:
SyphenTV wrote: What was fixed? MAV's? Bullshit. The only things added were SFK's voice lines and Juanjpro's new AI additions for the MTF.
Spoiler
Image
Oshit he was off by what, two minor bug fixes?
Dmitriy-Bars wrote:If the endings can be deleted because they are shit... Have you any idea, what needs to be changed in them? Or maybe this game must be FULLY DELETED?
Dmitriy-Bars wrote:Seriously, what the hell is going on with you all?
Finish the game by yourself, if you can improve bugs better than those "stupid" developers. >:(
You know outside of the fact that this has well, no real relation to anything in this thread whatsoever, I still never bought the whole "if you don't like it do it yourself!" mentality. Since when does someone have to excel at a task they're criticizing someone else for doing poorly?

Seriously though, what does this have to do with anything? Syphen was complaining about how the endings suck holy shit Im an edgy small text man i'm so cool at hiding my true responses aren't I?and you're getting triggered over him apparently saying that they can't fix bugs.
PXLSHN wrote:-snip-
Way to shoehorn in some unrelated stuff about how great and fantastic your new update is.okay here's edgy small text I actually want you to read. my real response to this would simply be "political correctness ftw"

The moral of the story is that no one here can form proper arguments to save themselves. What was the start of this argument again? Oh right, Syphen complaining about how reaching Gate A works. How many responses/counter-arguments relate to it? Zero. gg guys
Well yeah I know it was a bit Off-Topic.
The fact is that it is weird how Gate A works and we will maybe do some things in order to make it different to reach.
As I already said, I will take a look at the SCP-079 bug. Maybe there is still something wrong with it, maybe not. I'll have to check for myself.
So, we can say that these two bugs/issues might get fixed in 1.3 (SCP-079's glitch will be fixed if it still occurs, while for the GateA thing, I don't know. We are already making some methods for the game to make it more challenging and that might be also a good thing to change the GateA unlocking).
Image

Re: [1.2.3] Scp-079 M.A.V and Gate A Glitch?

#14
Vane Brain wrote:
Awesomeguy147 wrote: Getting offended by an opinion on a fictional creation.
Getting offended by an opinion of somthing you didn't make.
Getting offended by an opinion of something that your friend hi-jacked the development of.

Gee, if this is how you react to an opinion, I'd hate to see how you'd react to him pointing out how your only purpose in this team is to lord over everyone with your "super dev team status" and make excuses for everything Regalis and PXLSHN do, but I'm sure that will never happen.
Spoiler
See, I can be a sarcastic ass too.
You're probably not gonna take this well, but I'm willing to take that risk. A person can't change if they don't get whacked with some criticism every now and again.
Did you seriously think that we will remove endings? No! Maybe we can only change steps to open them.


edit
Spoiler
don't hate me :,(
I'm not saing that "I'm the Main Leader of the team and I'm do whatever I want"
... You know, I'm kind of getting tired of people not getting the point of my posts.

First of all, I don't hate you, if I did I wouldn't bother criticizing you, because that would imply I would have some hope for you to get better. If I did hate you, I wouldn't bother with you at all, or at the very least my post would look... let's say, "Less Constructive".

Second, alright, I was wrong when I implied when that was the only thing Vane Brain did, now please, feel free to prove me wrong on the part that actually mattered. My problem wasn't with his position in the team (although I suppose the fact that he does something is good to know) my problem was with him being the big excuse-maker of the group. Countless times I've seen criticism pop-up and countless times I've seen him treat it as something to discredit through any argument necessary, rather than something to help them. I've seen people like that time and again, and its not always the brightest path to take.

I suppose this is as far as this should go publicly. The mods are already probably gonna lock this because the thread derailed for a mere second and "Discussion is bad and drama is the devil and can never be constructive." If this continues here I won't blame them, but for now this was just a small altercation of two parties not quite seeing eye-to-eye, not that big of a deal.

What was this about again? MAV's? Yeah, sounds like a normal Tuesday.