
Re: Gun Control In The U.S.A.
#61Someone is seriously going to make this as an actual weapon, and it will be functional, and all hell will break loose.


"... your rubber ducky has also gone AWOL, captain."
Oh for fuck's sake the fuckhead who printed a so-called "gun" just printed the housing for a lower receiver for an AR-15 out of cheap shitty modeling plastic.spartan322 wrote:Yes, the issue with the 3D printing gun is not to be looked over. The problem is, that the government is trying to apply the old laws, the ones used currently for "real" guns, into this 3D printing business. The thing is, it won't work. The blueprints of a gun is not a gun, and shouldn't be treated as such. New laws must be applied in order for the 3D printed guns to not be a dangerous issue.Ketercheat wrote:These gun laws won't mean anything in a few years anyway. People will be 3d printing RPG's and MIRV's and stuff from the interweb. Soon the nerds will inherit the earth.
I am sure that we will be seeing a lot of this guns in the future. From household defense to small wars and battles. They are cheaper, easier to manufacture, and it wouldn't surprise me if they were started to be improved and then used by the army in a not so distant future.
It's not a gun. It's not even a part of the mechanism, moving part or non-moving part, it's part of the shell of the gun.Steelpoint wrote:* In reply to rarityismahwaifu
I think the concern of some people is that if a gun can be simply printed, even if the gun itself will fail after firing a few rounds, can still be a cause of concern. Mainly in that for starters you can't trace who owned a gun if it was printed out. Also if the technology gets better next thing you know you could arm an small army from a single 3D printer.
Also how much does it cost to make a printed gun? A printed gun that can fire even once is still just as much a threat as a real gun.
For note this video shows a 3D printed gun being fired.rarityismahwaifu wrote:It's not a gun. It's not even a part of the mechanism, moving part or non-moving part, it's part of the shell of the gun.Steelpoint wrote:* In reply to rarityismahwaifu
I think the concern of some people is that if a gun can be simply printed, even if the gun itself will fail after firing a few rounds, can still be a cause of concern. Mainly in that for starters you can't trace who owned a gun if it was printed out. Also if the technology gets better next thing you know you could arm an small army from a single 3D printer.
Also how much does it cost to make a printed gun? A printed gun that can fire even once is still just as much a threat as a real gun.
It's as much a gun as the wooden handguard on say a FN-FAL.
(http://oi41.tinypic.com/5ult7m.jpg)
It cost 75 cents in today's money to make on and give it 10 .45 rounds.Steelpoint wrote:Well there is a difference.
The FP-45 had to be made in a factory, or workshop.
A 3D Printed gun could eventually be made with near minimal effort.
Currently the 3D printed gun costs a lot to make, both getting a specially made printer and the other needed parts. But still the way technology changes printing a gun out could be cheaper then chips.