Page 4 of 6
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 4:31 am
by Cosmica
If I was a mod, I would close this fucking thread.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 4:34 am
by Omniary
Cosmica wrote:If I was a mod, I would close this fucking thread.
*totally read that in Beyonce's voice*
I kinda want to hear what some SCP Fans think about this though. Keep on topic, pls.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:47 am
by Cosmica
Omniary wrote:Cosmica wrote:If I was a mod, I would close this fucking thread.
*totally read that in Beyonce's voice*
I kinda want to hear what some SCP Fans think about this though. Keep on topic, pls.
Umm, Omniary, with all due respect...
The reason I said that is because nobody is talking about the original topic anymore.
I was the
only one keeping it on topic except for that post you just quoted. However, my post about SCP-173 on the previous page was completely ignored even when I posted it twice. But I'm the one you're singling out? Wow... Today is not my day...
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:49 am
by Cosmica
Now with that said,
Would you care to entertain my theory? Thanks.
Cosmica (Previously ignored by EVERYBODY) wrote:OK guys...
As you already know, SCP-173 is NOT supposed to move when you are looking at it. So, keeping one eye open while facing towards it is STILL considered looking at it. We're NOT supposed to see how it moves from point A to point B, nor how it snaps your head in half.
If he was in the corner of your right eye and you blinked it but kept the other open, he would move to exactly right before the vision in your open eye starts. Similar to the HUD map in Deus Ex, you can move anywhere except the "cone" areas which is the guards' or camera view. Moving inside the cone means they can now spot you.
Closing one eye makes the "cone" smaller, yes, but it doesn't make it totally disappear.
Agree?
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:20 am
by glitchking1221
Cosmica wrote:Now with that said,
Would you care to entertain my theory? Thanks.
Cosmica (Previously ignored by EVERYBODY) wrote:OK guys...
As you already know, SCP-173 is NOT supposed to move when you are looking at it. So, keeping one eye open while facing towards it is STILL considered looking at it. We're NOT supposed to see how it moves from point A to point B, nor how it snaps your head in half.
If he was in the corner of your right eye and you blinked it but kept the other open, he would move to exactly right before the vision in your open eye starts. Similar to the HUD map in Deus Ex, you can move anywhere except the "cone" areas which is the guards' or camera view. Moving inside the cone means they can now spot you.
Closing one eye makes the "cone" smaller, yes, but it doesn't make it totally disappear.
Agree?
I think it might just confuse 173. It might not understand if your blinking with just one eye, and it will either move, or stand still until you blink again. Something along those lines.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:26 am
by Sparks
Blinking one eye at a time should and would probably only work for a short while because it slowly distorts your view, slowly forcing you to blink both eyes.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:40 am
by Steelpoint
There are a few reasons as to why blinking one eye at a time will not work.
1. Under extreme pressure you may involuntarily blink, or fail to keep your pattern going.
2. You would get tired quickly of continually blinking.
3. SCP-173 is scary as hell!
4. That is no fun at all.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:57 am
by spartan322
Cosmica wrote:Omniary wrote:Cosmica wrote:If I was a mod, I would close this fucking thread.
*totally read that in Beyonce's voice*
I kinda want to hear what some SCP Fans think about this though. Keep on topic, pls.
Umm, Omniary, with all due respect...
The reason I said that is because nobody is talking about the original topic anymore.
I was the
only one keeping it on topic except for that post you just quoted. However, my post about SCP-173 on the previous page was completely ignored even when I posted it twice. But I'm the one you're singling out? Wow... Today is not my day...
Dude, if people didn't respond to your post, its just because they have nothing to say, or don't want to. Posting the same thing again won't change that, but make you look annoying.
Also, geting off topic on a thread is very common and nothing that makes a thread deserve being closed.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:06 pm
by WhiteAce
Cosmica, you are making it sound like replying to your posts is absoulutely mandatory when it isn't.
Re: Incredibly annoying debate regarding 173.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:26 pm
by Steelpoint
Keep this thread on topic.
Or else...
Just a little fun! Now back on topic!
