Sparks wrote:The only country I see at the moment that could start WW3 would be North Korea.

But then again, if they did, they would get beaten really fast, I mean, how many countries will it be against them?
The rest of the planet?

Pretty much, China and the USA would be against them if they did launch a nuke at someone

Jellycog wrote:

Richy wrote:Wouldn't happen. Germany's a member of Nato, and Japan is allied with the USA..
Also Japan and China are very unlikely to ally.

You'd be suprised. All those countries have one thing in common, and would make a heck of a fighting force. Hell, even Russia and Germany could whoop Britain's ass in seconds, and could move on to do the same for the USA. Germany has money, Russia has big bombs.

What do they have in common?

You all post valid points. Jellycog, I definitely agree. Communism is very effective for economic growth and production standards. I think Lenin's New Economic policy was the best but Stalin's control outmatched all. Overall, communism is a last resort when your country is on the verge of collapse, and even as a last resort, it will get your country stable again with the correct leadership. I am not saying communism is bad so use it as a last resort, I am saying: Communism is effective so use it when you have to. As for the rest of you, Germany --> WW3, No. They are doing too well to ask for any more than what they have. China or Korea starting a world war 3 is more likely, but Germany isn't under any circumstance, able to justify a cause for war. Checks and balances will make it so that there is a repeat of ww1 and ww2. I can see why countries would side with germany; they have money, but with NATO and other peace unions involved, germany most likely lack the allies needed to win a substancial war.

The Red Menace can you please stop Messaging me?

U.S. would join with China to fight whoever, due to the fact that both countries are joined at the wallet.

Vexification wrote:U.S. would join with China to fight whoever, due to the fact that both countries are joined at the wallet.

They do have strong economic ties, but they do disagree at times on numerous issues, Iran and Syria being an example of that

lololord wrote:The Red Menace can you please stop Messaging me?

yes, apologies my friend.

I see no point of this thread.

This is how i read that.

Richy wrote: They do have strong aroused titties, but they do disagree at times on numbered items, Iran and Syria being an example of that

Anyway, When is this thread getting locked?

lololord wrote:
Anyway, When is this thread getting locked?

Glitch.... come here...