Undertow Games Forum

Child Muncher wrote:You're just being childish trying to start a flame war. But alright.

So, finishing an argument is starting a Flame War.

Child Muncher wrote:So what you're trying to say is that because you said "the game has effort" means I'm not allowed to leave my remarks of the game as a reply to your comment?

The point is, is that you left something completely unrelated to what I said in a reply. Tell me how saying "the game has effort", which it does, which you tried to point out the opposite in your original comment, have anything to do with you preferring Snuff Porn then Furry breasts.

Pretty sure I said breasts in those last few posts. And you said you were going to start a flame war so I have no idea what you are talking about at that first bit. And can we just put this arguement to rest? You're obviously not understanding what I'm saying even though what I say makes perfect sense.

Child Muncher wrote:Pretty sure I said breasts in those last few posts. And you said you were going to start a flame war so I have no idea what you are talking about at that first bit. And can we just put this arguement to rest? You're obviously not understanding what I'm saying even though what I say makes perfect sense.

Yes, because I am going to argue with a retard.

I'ma just be the better man and walk away. There's no getting to you.

Would you care to elaborate on why I'm retarded?

And also I've said to stop two times but you wanted to continue on for some odd reason so I don't see how you're the "better man".

Oh god.

Both of you shut the fuck up.

Wow Syphen, I thought I'd never see just how much of a hypocrite you are. So when I want to argue with you, I'm an asshole and you simply walk away from the argument. However, when you want to argue, you keep pushing to have the argument, even when your opponent is using a different argument, unrelated to the one that you are pushing. Not trying to insult you, but I couldn't help but see this blatant contradiction.

So to Syphen, I'll ignore the fact that you didn't even present evidence to this effort and say, effort means nothing when the end result sucks.

To Child Muncher, Oh no, BREASTS. No, anything but dem perky double D's. I'm not saying that you have to like it, I see where you're coming from (FYI not a furry), but maybe, juuuuuuuust maybe, you might be over-reacting a bit.

Anyway, enough of the bickering and let's get back on topic........ actually, on second thought, lets not. I mean should we really continue discussing something this petty, this pathetic. I mean, it's 100%, absolutely clear that this is a trolling attempt. And what do trolls want people to do. They want them to talk about, think about it, become enraged at it. They want people to react to it, and what is this thread doing? Reacting to it. We even have some people become enraged because of this thread, granted that had more to do with their differing opinions on FNAF but still. I'm not necessarily going to say we should lock this thread, but I think the most rational decision would be to stop talking about it.

Awesomeguy147 wrote:Wow Syphen, I thought I'd never see just how much of a hypocrite you are. So when I want to argue with you, I'm an asshole and you simply walk away from the argument. However, when you want to argue, you keep pushing to have the argument, even when your opponent is using a different argument, unrelated to the one that you are pushing. Not trying to insult you, but I couldn't help but see this blatant contradiction.

To Child Muncher, Oh no, BREASTS. No, anything but dem perky double D's. I'm not saying that you have to like it, I see where you're coming from (FYI not a furry), but maybe, juuuuuuuust maybe, you might be over-reacting a bit.

This is nearly just as bad and toxic as the argument itself.

I'll just lock this. You're both arguing about furry breasts for fucks sake. Embarassing.