chris0matic wrote:

Krywk wrote:

chris0matic wrote: What do you mean by a port? Like a Linux Version?

Very much so.

You would have to wait, sadly, Since im already adding trees. Not so long though. Probally late tonight or tomorrow

I can wait. I already tested it through WINE, and works flawlessly, but a native client is always welcome, since Linux users didn't get SCP: Containment Breach for a Memory Access Violation problem. :/

Ive added all the trees. I think they look Great!
-

Are they meant to end that abruptly at the top?

Their old dead trees so yeah.

Very nice! For now, it's the 860 Experience, right? Are you gonna add 173, 106, 682...?
Because that'd be what I wanted, because I can't play SCP: Containment Breach under Linux.

Don't feel forced to do it, though, do whatever you want to do and feels right

Krywk wrote:Very nice! For now, it's the 860 Experience, right? Are you gonna add 173, 106, 682...?
Because that'd be what I wanted, because I can't play SCP: Containment Breach under Linux.

Don't feel forced to do it, though, do whatever you want to do and feels right

Well. Its uncanon to have another SCP inside 860-1. So No.

just a... warning:

The trees look to... blunt at the top, i dont know of a tree that is pre-posted. lol.

they are usually grown up so they grow pointed and branched near the top. the trunk is actually reletivly short.

SaitoFOX wrote:just a... warning:

The trees look to... blunt at the top, i dont know of a tree that is pre-posted. lol.

they are usually grown up so they grow pointed and branched near the top. the trunk is actually reletivly short.

So raise them higher?

SaitoFOX wrote:just a... warning:

The trees look to... blunt at the top, i dont know of a tree that is pre-posted. lol.

they are usually grown up so they grow pointed and branched near the top. the trunk is actually reletivly short.

Saito? Do you mind making/loaning me a good tree Model by chance? I cant make trees well... :/

chris0matic wrote:

Krywk wrote:Very nice! For now, it's the 860 Experience, right? Are you gonna add 173, 106, 682...?
Because that'd be what I wanted, because I can't play SCP: Containment Breach under Linux.

Don't feel forced to do it, though, do whatever you want to do and feels right

Well. Its uncanon to have another SCP inside 860-1. So No.

No, I meant, for now, you're just making the 860 Experience. But what's SCP: Lockdown about? Are you going to do other SCPs?