oh,its like System Shock 2.Playing multiplayer first before singleplayer ruins whole game!But multiplayer is buggy....I agree, multiplayer in SCP would completely ruin the mechanics of
the game as well as take away from some of the horror. It would
probably make more sense to screenshare and chat with friends, but
hey I'd still be interested to see what a multiplayer mod looks lik
exactly. not just that though. being scared to death with your buddies.Daxmarko wrote:sorry for terrible grammar,typing on phone is hard,gery hard.i was thinking that multiplayer can be just for fun and dat...
. After hhe takes you to his dimension, I think he disappears. If the player gets out and tries to recontain 106 while he's trying to kill player 2, well I don't even know. Plus, 
needs to pursue both players.What if you don't duplicate items and as such sharing shall be required?Ltn Vasquez wrote:The multiplayer mod looks really cool, but there would have to be massive changes to the game. Most notably, you'd have to double all the items in the game since there would be tow people in the game. Also, you're going to have to see to
By the way, what happens when one player dies? I hink they should spawn in 173's chamber.
Last though, both players need to spawn together. Make a duplicate of the D-class spawn room and a duplicate of the guard. Then, both players can start at the same point.
You expect to people to share a gas mask on a cat walk? If one gets to the other side where SCP 173 is, then you're boned unless you use precise teamwork.rarityismahwaifu wrote:What if you don't duplicate items and as such sharing shall be required?Ltn Vasquez wrote:The multiplayer mod looks really cool, but there would have to be massive changes to the game. Most notably, you'd have to double all the items in the game since there would be tow people in the game. Also, you're going to have to see to
By the way, what happens when one player dies? I hink they should spawn in 173's chamber.
Last though, both players need to spawn together. Make a duplicate of the D-class spawn room and a duplicate of the guard. Then, both players can start at the same point.
Besides not like you could find two SCP-714's.
Gas masks are a different matter.Ltn Vasquez wrote:You expect to people to share a gas mask on a cat walk? If one gets to the other side where SCP 173 is, then you're boned unless you use precise teamwork.rarityismahwaifu wrote:What if you don't duplicate items and as such sharing shall be required?Ltn Vasquez wrote:The multiplayer mod looks really cool, but there would have to be massive changes to the game. Most notably, you'd have to double all the items in the game since there would be tow people in the game. Also, you're going to have to see to
By the way, what happens when one player dies? I hink they should spawn in 173's chamber.
Last though, both players need to spawn together. Make a duplicate of the D-class spawn room and a duplicate of the guard. Then, both players can start at the same point.
Besides not like you could find two SCP-714's.
Speaking of teamwork, there needs to be a voice and text chat for players to communicate.
Yay! I can't wait to play with a friend.MonocleBios wrote:I'm just about done my RL shenanigans (HS done in 3 weeks, last day of work in 4) so hopefully I'll be able to go ham on this project for the two months before I head to uni. About 75% of the events are ready for testing, but in order to get an early alpha out there, I'm thinking that it might be a good idea to skip the intro/exits and possibly the PD (Heck, it might be easier to leave 106 out of apha1). Before you all yell at me, remember that you signed up as 'testers' and not for 'early access to multiplayer for a grand ol' time.' As for Adam, he's been as busy as I have, If I end up finishing events early in July I'll attempt to apply the same network mechanics to NPC's as I did to the events. At the end of the day, it's his project so I'll let him decide what needs to be done.
