Re: SCP-513

#331
D-9999 wrote:
SCP-Sean wrote:i just wanted to say, if you turn off the secondairy lighting in the controlls room (room2ccont), when you open a new game, everything will be dark! :laugh:
Please don't double post, Sean. :x
Or, as Bane said, just report the double post, but alright.

Bad Sean!

*Slaps Sean's wrist*

Re: SCP-513

#332
I don't understand what's so horrible with double posting, even when it's spam; if it's spam, the only reason it should be reported for is for being spam, not being "double posted spam".
Did Sean's "double post" clutter up the conversation? No. So what's wrong with it? Sure it could all be optimized into one comment, but does it really matter that much if not for "aesthetic" reasons.

It seems to me that people who complain about double posting are being rather whiny about it, most of the time; sometimes there are indeed instances when double posting is leading to spam, but that's when it's in masses. I don't think that having a double post once, twice, or as many times as possible as long as it doesn't lead to spam (that is not to say having it all in a row), will have any negative effect on the conversation whatsoever.
That being said, I have no clue as to what it does on the technical side of things, such as the server or whatnot.
Some quick links for myself (and you all too).
SCP-096 model
MTF model
Forum Smileys
deviantART
Pixel Joint

Enjoy

Re: SCP-513

#333
Night wrote:I don't understand what's so horrible with double posting, even when it's spam; if it's spam, the only reason it should be reported for is for being spam, not being "double posted spam".
Did Sean's "double post" clutter up the conversation? No. So what's wrong with it? Sure it could all be optimized into one comment, but does it really matter that much if not for "aesthetic" reasons.

It seems to me that people who complain about double posting are being rather whiny about it, most of the time; sometimes there are indeed instances when double posting is leading to spam, but that's when it's in masses. I don't think that having a double post once, twice, or as many times as possible as long as it doesn't lead to spam (that is not to say having it all in a row), will have any negative effect on the conversation whatsoever.
That being said, I have no clue as to what it does on the technical side of things, such as the server or whatnot.
I'm not exactly sure what's wrong with it either, but I just follow the rules. :x
My YouTube. I make bad content.
My Steam. Add me if you'd like.

Re: SCP-513

#334
It's easy. Just say the rule once, if the writer breaks it. It's okay that you follow the rules, but you don't need to quote the rule multiple types, report the post if the user does not refrain.

Also, refraining from off-topic.

Re: SCP-513

#335
His "Eyes" are right over his mouth. To the left of the hole there's two ovals devoid of blood. Those are his eyes.
Image
I WANT TO [REDACTED] INSIDE TWILIGHT SPARKLE
DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
Atheros drivers SUCK!

Re: Exposition of SCP-513 Modding

#336
Cridone wrote:
Image
It doesn't really matter I guess.

Also, I put some eyes on 513-1.
Spoiler
Image
Yep, you got most of it right. I was really bad at learning to unwrap at that time.. I let blender detect and do it automatically and didn't know how to scale or transform the UV's for maximum texture efficiency.

Re: SCP-513

#337
Please don't double post, Sean. :x
Your OK.
Don't turn into the rest of the forum.
Pass me an unlabeled texture an ill turn it into a UV.

Re: SCP-513

#339
SCP 513 wrote:
Spoiler
Image
That's the creepiest thing i've seen yet... nice!, sounds like modelling is really hard, glad to hear you didn't give up though.
ERIC IS LOVE, ERIC IS LIFE.

Re: SCP-513

#340
Still looks good! The head needs to be a lot more bony. And fit the old texture on it
Image
I WANT TO [REDACTED] INSIDE TWILIGHT SPARKLE
DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
Atheros drivers SUCK!
cron