Mirocaine mentioned something with lots of eyes. SCP-682 has lots of eyes due to the 173 test. O.o

juanjpro wrote:

Spoiler

Anyone notice anything familiar in the banner, or is it just me?

I didn't notice that before, looks like the new models made by Myro, the (MTF?) soldier with the new P90, to the left, i'm sure its gotta be 682 or something similar.

Mirocaine wrote: nazi mods..

Not cool man. If you disagree with how i do things then PM me or Steelpoint instead of doing that kind of comments.

Irontaco wrote:

Mirocaine wrote: nazi mods..

Not cool man. If you disagree with how i do things then PM me or Steelpoint instead of doing that kind of comments.

Omniary told me on Steam that he was just joking...

Sweet, Taco's putting his foot down.

I really want to see how optimized the forest is now compared to my initial tests.

Oh yea, hype... [insert x smilies here]!!!111ONEONEONE

That thing on the left could also be SCP-860-2, but it doesn't really look like Moonsabers model.
SCP-682 would be awesome!

Also, I needed about five minutes to see the MTF in the banner.

Irontaco wrote: Not cool man. If you disagree with how i do things then PM me or Steelpoint instead of doing that kind of comments.

LOL. I'm just playing, common twitch.tv response to moderator chat abuse. You guys r the bst moderators, that's why you'll never ban me, right??

actually I'm surprised he showed so much of them on the new banner, I can see the new mtf battling the

Mirocaine wrote:

Irontaco wrote: Not cool man. If you disagree with how i do things then PM me or Steelpoint instead of doing that kind of comments.

LOL. I'm just playing, common twitch.tv response to moderator chat abuse. You guys r the bst moderators, that's why you'll never ban me, right??

actually I'm surprised he showed so much of them on the new banner, I can see the new mtf battling the

the-

u fockin tease

1.0 in truth is a cover up for 1.1 and 1.2

I believe I have correctly determined which SCPs have been teased in the banner. I won't spoil what they are, but 682 is not one of them.

I am very excited for the addition of these more unconventional choices, and so is Eric.

Mirocaine wrote:1.0 in truth is a cover up for 1.1 and 1.2