Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki

#31
Steelpoint wrote:Hey I tried my best in improving the old wikia, I oversaw many changes including.

- Adding of content tab to each individual SCP page
- Adding of Video tab to front page
- Creation of Page Outline Guide
- Unbanning several forum users who were banned for dumb reasons.

And other things that I can post to boost me E-Peen!

In seriousness I would never attempt to screw up the wiki.
Still going on about that? Doesn't matter what you do, anyway I do not think your IQ is that low in order to screw up a whole wiki.

I only contributed one thing to the wiki which was a close-up of 049, it got removed shortly though.
Mandatory blank signature, here.

Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki

#32
WhiteAce wrote:Still going on about that? Doesn't matter what you do, anyway I do not think your IQ is that low in order to screw up a whole wiki.

I only contributed one thing to the wiki which was a close-up of 049, it got removed shortly though.
Obvious humor aside.

I think that image was removed as we were trying to get a good HD picture of SCP-049, we went through several before we settled on one. I think it was Omniarys that we used.
SCP:CB Administrator. 99% of my statements are my own and do not represent the official developers viewpoint.

Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki

#35
Irontaco wrote:Neat, it looks a lot better now.

Hey, can i become admin/moderator of this wikia too? I can occasionally keep watch over it, and i do some edits every now and then (adding interesting, true facts!), but it's okay if you feel that i shouldn't be one.
We're currently not adding any new admins at the moment (save for Omniary and Steelpoint since they were the only admins on the old wiki that actually gave a shit about it well, maybe Hibby also).

Once we get settled into the new wiki then we'll consider new administrators.

Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki

#37
CommanderPro100 wrote:
Irontaco wrote:Neat, it looks a lot better now.

Hey, can i become admin/moderator of this wikia too? I can occasionally keep watch over it, and i do some edits every now and then (adding interesting, true facts!), but it's okay if you feel that i shouldn't be one.
We're currently not adding any new admins at the moment (save for Omniary and Steelpoint since they were the only admins on the old wiki that actually gave a shit about it well, maybe Hibby also).

Once we get settled into the new wiki then we'll consider new administrators.
Commander you are sooooo funny, haha, no offense Steelport, but him, he was on like 1 time a week, and Ominary, hardly touched it, Hibby, yeah... I'll give ya that. I don't even know how your brain can register how it was bad? Nevermind not mention the hard working users (DarkDread, Zab, Hug, D-9999, Fire and many more) Why the fuck didn't you mention these, huh? Oh, wait... it has to be the Admins because you want to be there mates, and give them NICE compliments so you can get promoted, I can't even... how, just how!? No offense but they where 5x MORE active than them, 5x! It wasn't even bad, apart from a small number of grammar issues, the baddest thing was probably the Roleplaying! So... just... look at the old Wikis pages, compare em'. Not a fuckin' issue wrong with them.
Hello, I am [[REDACTED]], [[REDACTED]]. I have been a fan of SCP for [[REDACTED]] [[REDACTED]]. I am also on the SCP:CB Wiki, and thats it so... [[REDACTED]] off much?

Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki

#38
Daniel123Shaw123 wrote:Commander you are sooooo funny, haha, no offense Steelport, but him, he was on like 1 time a week, and Ominary, hardly touched it, Hibby, yeah... I'll give ya that. I don't even know how your brain can register how it was bad? Nevermind not mention the hard working users (DarkDread, Zab, Hug, D-9999, Fire and many more) Why the fuck didn't you mention these, huh? Oh, wait... it has to be the Admins because you want to be there mates, and give them NICE compliments so you can get promoted, I can't even... how, just how!? No offense but they where 5x MORE active than them, 5x! It wasn't even bad, apart from a small number of grammar issues, the baddest thing was probably the Roleplaying! So... just... look at the old Wikis pages, compare em'. Not a fuckin' issue wrong with them.
...

Re: Official Containment Breach Wiki

#39
Daniel123Shaw123 wrote:
CommanderPro100 wrote:
Irontaco wrote:Neat, it looks a lot better now.

Hey, can i become admin/moderator of this wikia too? I can occasionally keep watch over it, and i do some edits every now and then (adding interesting, true facts!), but it's okay if you feel that i shouldn't be one.
We're currently not adding any new admins at the moment (save for Omniary and Steelpoint since they were the only admins on the old wiki that actually gave a shit about it well, maybe Hibby also).

Once we get settled into the new wiki then we'll consider new administrators.
Commander you are sooooo funny, haha, no offense Steelport, but him, he was on like 1 time a week, and Ominary, hardly touched it, Hibby, yeah... I'll give ya that. I don't even know how your brain can register how it was bad? Nevermind not mention the hard working users (DarkDread, Zab, Hug, D-9999, Fire and many more) Why the fuck didn't you mention these, huh? Oh, wait... it has to be the Admins because you want to be there mates, and give them NICE compliments so you can get promoted, I can't even... how, just how!? No offense but they where 5x MORE active than them, 5x! It wasn't even bad, apart from a small number of grammar issues, the baddest thing was probably the Roleplaying! So... just... look at the old Wikis pages, compare em'. Not a fuckin' issue wrong with them.
I wish this was written in English.
Administrator at the Official SCP:CB Wiki