Re: SCP Containment Breach, remake.

#7
SyphenTV wrote:
DescreetLort wrote:
Cridone wrote:...This isn't official news. -_-
bruh
...what? He's right; this isn't official news. Regalis didn't announce anything about a remake, you suggested it and to make a kickstarter.

I don't think you know what official news is.
Why am I even able to put stuff into official news, I would think official meant that I had to be official, then I though ''It probably gets transfered to some other catagory, but if you don't like that I put it it, why did you then click it?

Re: SCP Containment Breach, remake.

#8
DescreetLort wrote: Why am I even able to put stuff into official news,
Because Regalis or Steelpoint didn't make the thread Moderator/Admin only (if that's such a thing in PhPP or whatever this service is). And besides, there has been some good posts from users posting in this section. Sadly, your post isn't one of them.
DescreetLort wrote:I would think official meant that I had to be official,
Uh yeah, it does.
DescreetLort wrote:then I thought ''It probably gets transferred to some other category,
Good assumption; though it doesn't work like that.
DescreetLort wrote:but if you don't like that I put it it, why did you then click it?
If you're seriously going to pull that "If you don't like it then why'd you click it?" shit, let me ask you this; you couldn't have thought of a more retarded response? Really? If we're going to pull shit from 2009, you could've told me.

And besides, if you have half of a brain you'd know I need to click on the thread to view it and know what's inside. I didn't know it wasn't official news until I looked inside.

Put shit like this in General Offtopic or General Discussion next time.