Though he's disguised himself as our buddy SCP:372.This is sort of fitting, considering that our old pal 513-1 was actually removed and replaced by 372 in an earlier patch. Oh how I miss my old friend. *cries*

513-1 372

I think the reason why SCP-372 uses SCP-513-1's skin is because you do not get to actually see 372 long enough to make it out, also going to the effort to create a fully fleshed out model for something most people will never see is a waste of time.

Steelpoint wrote:I think the reason why SCP-372 uses SCP-513-1's skin is because you do not get to actually see 372 long enough to make it out, also going to the effort to create a fully fleshed out model for something most people will never see is a waste of time.

Thing is, since we barely see 372, like you mentioned, what's the point of giving it a face anyway? Especially 513-1's face, considering that 513-1 was decommissioned solely so that 372 could replace him. I'd like to think that this was Regalis / the person who modelled 372 paying homage to an old friend. <3

The old 513-1 model was two dimensional, meaning it was essentially just a rotating png image that moved to face the character automatically. Which means that time and effort (even if not a lot) went into pasting his face onto a 3D model and messing around with it to make it fit the head etc.

#Tinfoilhats
#Wehavetogodeeper
#Illuminati

Or Regalis simply wanted a green skin for SCP-372, so he took a, now non used skin, and changed the color to green. Much quicker than crating something else from scratch. Yes while we don't see its face we do briefly see its color.

I definitely think that 513 could definitely be reimplemented. I've been working on an idea of how he could work along with some sound files, heh.

GamingMediocrity wrote:-snip-

I knew about that before but...
[Off-topic]Welcome GamingMediocrity! I watch you on youtube The pal with big hat

Whoa, thats actually you GamingMediocrity? Nice to see a Lets Player join this site!

Omniary wrote:I definitely think that 513 could definitely be reimplemented

FTFY

That would be meh...

SCP 513 wrote:

Omniary wrote:I definitely think that 513 could definitely be reimplemented

FTFY

That would be meh...

Do you even really know what FTFY means? I've seen you use it multiple times after I used it once and half the posts you quoted weren't even changed.

And saying that it'd be meh is odd considering there was a point where 513 was all you could suggest. I have been planning some of this out though, and Regalis thinks it could work.

Omniary wrote: Do you even really know what FTFY means? I've seen you use it multiple times after I used it once and half the posts you quoted weren't even changed.

And saying that it'd be meh is odd considering there was a point where 513 was all you could suggest. I have been planning some of this out though, and Regalis thinks it could work.

Easy there jimmy rustler... FTFY = Fixed That For You

And As I Said... I am working with SCP 513 1 modelling now... Regalis could use my help to do that....