I just read that SCP, and I find it hilarious. So simple, yet so much Delicious reality-bending weirdness.
All of my yes.
Re: Flashbangs
#12It could be a perfect troll too! One minute its use would make a weird sound that distracts the MTFs; another, it could randomly spawn 173 (not sure if that's canon or not). Anyways, someone else suggested the second idea! 

"Yes, it's a goddamn nuke, but if 682 survives and adapts we'd be boned beyond belief."


Re: Flashbangs
#13scpharrisee wrote:It could be a perfect troll too! One minute its use would make a weird sound that distracts the MTFs; another, it could randomly spawn 173 (not sure if that's canon or not). Anyways, someone else suggested the second idea!
another, it could randomly spawn 173 (not sure if that's canon or not)
(not sure if that's canon or not)
not sure if that's canon
NO. WE MAKE OUR OWN CANON .____.canon
Re: Flashbangs
#14Fair enough
After all, the Foundation does owe us a lot - we've immensely boosted their popularity.

After all, the Foundation does owe us a lot - we've immensely boosted their popularity.
"Yes, it's a goddamn nuke, but if 682 survives and adapts we'd be boned beyond belief."


Re: Flashbangs
#15By word of Regalis the game should be as canon as possible.
And anything spawing an instance od SCP-173 is obviously not canon.
And anything spawing an instance od SCP-173 is obviously not canon.
God is perfect -> Nobody is perfect -> I'm nobody --> I'm perfect --> I'm God.
Re: Flashbangs
#16I'm failing to see the logic in this. Remember that 539 spawned Komodo dragons and made security personnel have their clothing just vanish during testing. So, using 539 to spawn 173 wouldn't be entirely outside the realm of canon. Besides, there's nothing stating it can't "summon" other SCPs.Lusor1111 wrote:By word of Regalis the game should be as canon as possible.
And anything spawing an instance od SCP-173 is obviously not canon.
Administrator at the Official SCP:CB Wiki