SyphenTV wrote:
Isn't that what it's supposed to be? A formal notice?

Commander is saying it doesn't sound like a formal notice, and more of a plot reveal.

I don't think it really matters. That's like saying 'NICE WORK FOUNDATION, YOU MADE IT SO EASY' is to just further the plot.
All in all, we could certainly use some more obvious openings to the backstory.
I'm sick of hearing people say that containment breach has absolutely zero plot as one of its cons.

Hubbawubba64 wrote:I'm sick of hearing people say that containment breach has absolutely zero plot as one of its cons.

When has anyone ever said CB sucks because it has no plot?

CommanderPro100 wrote: When has anyone ever said CB sucks because it has no plot?

I've dedicated all my free time to everything about this game on the internet. When the slot for 'story' in reviews is addressed, it will mostly say N/A or 'none' or sometimes 'not much'. Also, user reviews can sometimes say 'there isn't really much story to the game or what caused the breach'.
Finally, I'd like to clarify that I never said anyone disliked the game because of its lack of obvious plot, all the reviews I've read are positive, it's just on the 'cons' side sometimes next to 'graphics'.
It's a small issue but it's easy to take care of. If you want some sources, I'll be happy to cite some.

Attempted to re-do the Maynard note- maybe it is better that the first one: Link

AveryLP wrote:Attempted to re-do the Maynard note- maybe it is better that the first one: Link

Much better. Minor grammar error though. "an disciplinary" should be changed to "a disciplinary", "an" is only used when the word after it starts with a vowel.

CommanderPro100 wrote:

AveryLP wrote:Attempted to re-do the Maynard note- maybe it is better that the first one: Link

Much better. Minor grammar error though. "an disciplinary" should be changed to "a disciplinary", "an" is only used when the word after it starts with a vowel.

Fixed that grammar error(English isn't my first language so errors may happen sometimes): Fixed version
Also I made an new Class-D orientation leaflet based on the newer document design: New Class-D orientation leaflet

Much better. The Dr. Maynard note is a lot better (still a bit awkward to read). The Class-D Orientation one feels empty at the bottom, and it looks like some of the words, the box, and the Designation are offset from the middle.


Other then that, it's good.

AveryLP wrote:Also I made an new Class-D orientation leaflet based on the newer document design: New Class-D orientation leaflet

Yeah, the new orientation leaflet looks pretty bad. You're other documents look good though, so I give props on those.

Cridone wrote:

AveryLP wrote:Also I made an new Class-D orientation leaflet based on the newer document design: New Class-D orientation leaflet

Yeah, the new orientation leaflet looks pretty bad. You're other documents look good though, so I give props on those.

Yep I know it is bad and I have removed the link to it.

AveryLP wrote:

Cridone wrote:

AveryLP wrote:Also I made an new Class-D orientation leaflet based on the newer document design: New Class-D orientation leaflet

Yeah, the new orientation leaflet looks pretty bad. You're other documents look good though, so I give props on those.

Yep I know it is bad and I have removed the link to it.

Stuff looks cropped. Are you using photoshop or just copy/pasting assets from other documents? (I think I know the answer anyway.)