Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#41
Steelpoint wrote:I love concept art, I would be quite happy to see more fan art and concept art of the game.
Then you should head to DA, where SCP art is quiet common, and there is actually a quiet bunch of fan art and comics making fun of this game, is quiet hilarious. XD

Example:
Image
Inspiration is our best weapon.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#42
CostaRic wrote:
Jellycog wrote:
CostaRic wrote:
What if SCP 173 was only a cacoon, for hes real form, theoretically talking? And a newer SCP explained into further detail that this is hes actual form inside the cacoon, wich was wrapped into cement and metal and forged this monstrosity? That could actually explain the crack on its forehead( it was almost ready to eclode). I will just recreate the statue, adn the story will remain the same, just so it can fit into the actual(future) game and the internal "true form" of SCP 173. :D
Changing that much about 173 would not make people happy, considering he is the most famous SCP of them all. All regalis should do is fix his new head (It looks really stupid) and that will be that.
The rework would be more of a visual upgrade other than a story change. The Story remains canon, the character model and general graphics doesn't. That's as much as there is to it.
You don't understand, do you?
He won't be changed, he will stay the way he is, because THAT IS THE REAL 173. Thats realistic because it is the exact same thing as in the article. No, there will not be a visual change that affects 173 that way, get that out of your head.

Just so you know, Trex didn't do anything, YOU were the one starting all the talk about insulting and stuff.
-Resident Bacon Fanatic-

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#43
The rework would be more of a visual upgrade other than a story change. The Story remains canon, the character model and general graphics doesn't. That's as much as there is to it.[/quote]
You don't understand, do you?
He won't be changed, he will stay the way he is, because THAT IS THE REAL 173. Thats realistic because it is the exact same thing as in the article. No, there will not be a visual change that affects 173 that way, get that out of your head.

Just so you know, Trex didn't do anything, YOU were the one starting all the talk about insulting and stuff.[/quote]

We already settled everything, you should read more of the post before commenting.
Inspiration is our best weapon.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#44
Using your super mind reading powers, tell me, how many post have I read? Because it seems you know the exact ammount people have read.
-Resident Bacon Fanatic-

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#45
spartan322 wrote:Using your super mind reading powers, tell me, how many post have I read? Because it seems you know the exact ammount people have read.
All time posts or only until you commented on this post last replay? That'd be around 30, and almost half a billion in a lifetime as an average.

And is only called high deduction power, nothing special...
Inspiration is our best weapon.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#46
CostaRic wrote:
spartan322 wrote:Using your super mind reading powers, tell me, how many post have I read? Because it seems you know the exact ammount people have read.
All time posts or only until you commented on this post last replay? That'd be around 30, and almost half a billion in a lifetime as an average.

And is only called high deduction power, nothing special...
Yep nothing special, because you are wrong.
I have read the entire thread, and its true while you stopped on the mod/rules "fight" (ignora that, my fault for bringing it up again) you still talk about a re-make of 173.
-Resident Bacon Fanatic-

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#47
spartan322 wrote:
CostaRic wrote:
spartan322 wrote:Using your super mind reading powers, tell me, how many post have I read? Because it seems you know the exact ammount people have read.
All time posts or only until you commented on this post last replay? That'd be around 30, and almost half a billion in a lifetime as an average.

And is only called high deduction power, nothing special...
Yep nothing special, because you are wrong.
I have read the entire thread, and its true while you stopped on the mod/rules "fight" (ignora that, my fault for bringing it up again) you still talk about a re-make of 173.
Was it that hard to understand?
Inspiration is our best weapon.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#48
CostaRic wrote:
SCP-682 wrote:I saw no shit-talking anywhere, here or your dA. And no, I don't think the author, or anyone on the SCP Community, would like the legendary 173 to be changed. If this is for personal pleasure, sure, go ahead, nothing wrong with that. But trying to make it official or anything like that just won't work (OOC, I'm a member of the Foundation site, I'll run it by them to see what they themselves think of it)
What if SCP 173 was only a cacoon, for hes real form, theoretically talking? And a newer SCP explained into further detail that this is hes actual form inside the cacoon, wich was wrapped into cement and metal and forged this monstrosity? That could actually explain the crack on its forehead( it was almost ready to eclode). I will just recreate the statue, adn the story will remain the same, just so it can fit into the actual(future) game and the internal "true form" of SCP 173. :D
.......... NO...... just NO... just.... just..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#49
I like it, but as said, I'm trying to keep the game as canon as possible.

Also, I'm not Geogmz. My nick in the SCPCB wiki is Regalis11.

Re: SCP-173 Concept Art

#50
Oh, my fucking god. I hate to get upset about this. But im letting it out.



Ahem, Your work isnt going to be put ingame. It looks horrible, The fact that your trying to make 173 Look like a alien is clearly stupid. Its staying the way it is and there is nothing you will do about it. Now Get over it and stop Trying to get chances. Its Not happening, Got it?
Image