Delusional wrote:You forgot a few, they were projects made by other people but ID did publish them, they are: Final Doom: The plutonia experiment and Final Doom: TNT Evilution.

Those were included in Final Doom, forgot to add that in. Point still stands.

Just voicing my opinion on it.

Overall though I was just kind of annoyed not being able to have a horse in revelations, the lack of good DLC and a too short story, completed it in 5 hours within breaks of course, I started playing assassins creed 3 for about 12 hours (Not bothering with much but just screwing around) then I grew tired of it, it's the same old repeatable stuff just with a few new fancy features that I am not overly fond of.

EDIT: Also, it was too rushed.

In fact, COD doens't look too milked, Modern Warfare made the franchise hit the fan, Treyarch actually makes good COD's, they are the holy creators of Zombies while Infinity ward made 1 and 2 a masterpiece, 4, MW2 and MW3 are shit

Didn't really mind III myself. I liked the scale of it.

But II and Brotherhood were darn fine games. The best I had ever played.

Revelations.. I just skipped completely.

As for Black Flags. I think they should have left the " IV " out of the title. It seems more like an expansion to me than a Full Game. Of course, I wonder how long they have been working on it. They told everyone that they had been working on III since II was released.

I think the REAL " Assassin's Creed IV " will appear on the Next Gen Consoles.

On a side note, I never actually had any game breaking problems with III but when they released the most recent update for it, All these glitches began happening like Dogs sinking into the Ground and Connor and a Elk getting frozen in a Button Sequence Animation since a Bobcat thought it would be funny to attack while I was trying to press all the Buttons.

FireFox wrote:Didn't really mind III myself. I liked the scale of it.

But II and Brotherhood were darn fine games. The best I had ever played.

Revelations.. I just skipped completely.

As for Black Flags. I think they should have left the " IV " out of the title. It seems more like an expansion to me than a Full Game. Of course, I wonder how long they have been working on it. They told everyone that they had been working on III since II was released.

I think the REAL " Assassin's Creed IV " will appear on the Next Gen Consoles.

If the had skipped the in-between games I think people would be a lot less tired of the franchise. It's just so ridiculous now.

Destructoid wrote:

FireFox wrote:Didn't really mind III myself. I liked the scale of it.

But II and Brotherhood were darn fine games. The best I had ever played.

Revelations.. I just skipped completely.

As for Black Flags. I think they should have left the " IV " out of the title. It seems more like an expansion to me than a Full Game. Of course, I wonder how long they have been working on it. They told everyone that they had been working on III since II was released.

I think the REAL " Assassin's Creed IV " will appear on the Next Gen Consoles.

If the had skipped the in-between games I think people would be a lot less tired of the franchise. It's just so ridiculous now.

I suppose.

Though, I started at II then got Brotherhood.

Brotherhood was probably the only good expansion released.

Seriously though if they are going to do stuff like that they should have just bundled in Assassins creed brotherhood with ACR in the first place and then released both of them.

Delusional wrote:Ubisoft is doing exactly what IW and activision do and just milking the entire series itself get milked, the story also appears to be getting shorter and shorter and the endings shittier,just let the whole desmond conflict end for crying out loud because it's pissing me off.

Did you complete the ending in 3
The story in 3 definitely wasn't as good as the others since they had to get rid of Ezio.

You know there might be a chance that they decide to make it good and not just ruin the whole thing beyond repair..... however Activision is involved in this so I guess the chance of that happening would be pretty slim.

edit: and you seem to have a huge amount of bugs that I never encountered... I wonder why that would, oh I'll just get to the point, PS3 > XBOX (sorry but I had to do it)

INFINITE561 wrote:

MOV_Games wrote:

INFINITE561 wrote:

omg I know right! split screen used to be so fun cos instead of screaming down a mic to someone half way across the world you cud just turn to your side and swear at your friend or something, I remember doing split screen with my granddad on medal of honour on the PS1 <3...and thx you for mentioning spyro! omg that game was legend! I remember sprinting down those arrows on the floor and yo go so fast you practically fly thru half the level....crash bandicoot had some funny deaths :3

3 had some pretty varied death animations, i agree, even though some of them he didnt even die (the Arab Swordsmen just cut off his shorts if i remember correctly). To be honest the only classic Mascot of all the consoles i dont like is Mario.

Sorry for the different conversation going on here, im just slow responding to posts