CommanderPro100 wrote: Believe me, I've done that many times and within a few days is re-filled with the same crap.

I'm not asking you to fix the problems, I'm just saying that it's pointless to try to reform pages when it constantly gets re-filled with crap, and the admins don't do shit about it. Also, how exactly do you want me to prove that people have been banned from the wiki for removing crap info, what do you want a video? The first post on this thread is a good example of someone being banned for adding shit, and I seriously doubt Destructoid was lying.

You're starting to repeat yourself, stop being so stubborn. e_e As said before, it's not only admins who can remove "crap", you can too (which you apparently haven't been doing, despite your claims - your contribution log doesn't show much). Destructoid's case has been resolved a long time ago - that's back then when the wiki had even worse problems than it does now.

And yes, I do want proof for being banned for that. Unverified claims don't do much, and that's pretty much all you're doing.

Ltn Vasquez wrote: Actually, I would like to contribute. Even though there is a lot of bad feeling going around, I can probably help out to clean up the pages. Just give me the call and I'll go do it.

Go on and contribute, then! There's no need for permission or a "call" - considering its current state, contribution is well welcome. Just remember to create an account first.

Awesomeguy147 wrote: Proof is that this thread even needs to exist. If the admins were doing the job there then there wouldn't be a mess to complain about. How do you suppose they provide you with the proof that they were banned, I think them just saying it is proof enough, as there isn't really any reason to lie. So the administration obviously is to blame, and with them adding back any removals done by banned people, they are essentially the only ones that can remove the information.

It would appear it is obvious who is responsible for all of this. The course of action I suggest: Remove all admins/moderators (except for stellpoint and Regalis, and anybody else that is known to not be part of the problem(but especially get rid of CostaRic if he is still there)) from the wiki before they even know what happened. After that a new generation of moderators would fix the wiki. Whether the plan would fix it or not is unknown, but it would help.

First of all, thanks for your input. Glad that there are still others caring about this.

Screenshotting the ban message is enough proof. (also, if there are any mistakenly banned people reading this post, PM me with your IP, and I'll get the issue resolved.) Should you add valid information and having it undone by an admin, calling it faulty, talk it up with them.

Also, removing administrators just doesn't do it. Considering that there are only 3 active ones right now, promoting new ones is a valid idea but there aren't any contributors right now that would deserve the position.

Zabidenu wrote:

Ltn Vasquez wrote: Actually, I would like to contribute. Even though there is a lot of bad feeling going around, I can probably help out to clean up the pages. Just give me the call and I'll go do it.

Go on and contribute, then! There's no need for permission or a "call" - considering its current state, contribution is well welcome. Just remember to create an account first.

Cool, I'll get to work on that. If anybody can, just pot what needs to be fixed and I'll get right to it. I intend to make the wiki much more than it is now. However, I hope that none of the admins will piss on me despite my kindly manner.

Ltn Vasquez wrote:Cool, I'll get to work on that. If anybody can, just pot what needs to be fixed and I'll get right to it. I intend to make the wiki much more than it is now. However, I hope that none of the admins will piss on me despite my kindly manner.

You're being unnecessarily paranoid there. :v Behave yourself, and you'll be fine.

Zabidenu wrote:

Ltn Vasquez wrote:Cool, I'll get to work on that. If anybody can, just pot what needs to be fixed and I'll get right to it. I intend to make the wiki much more than it is now. However, I hope that none of the admins will piss on me despite my kindly manner.

You're being unnecessarily paranoid there. :v Behave yourself, and you'll be fine.

Tell that to Commander, haha.

Actually don't, I don't want the Gulag.

Anyways, I just want to see that everything goes well with you guys.

Perhaps Ltn wouldn't be so paranoid if the other admins didn't have such a shitty track-record.

Double Post nescecarry, I started work on it. The Main Guard page is so bloody messy. I've started to clean it up.

So far, the Equipment list was deleted an merged to the description. Also, the Suicide Guard was described in the main page and it will be deleted for purposes of being too minor of a character.

Ltn Vasquez wrote:the Suicide Guard was described in the main page and it will be deleted for purposes of being too minor of a character.

i'm sorry, but it dosen't care if the suicide guard is minor, all the guards are minor according to the minor character page, so no, the page will not be deleted.

hug0905 wrote:

Ltn Vasquez wrote:the Suicide Guard was described in the main page and it will be deleted for purposes of being too minor of a character.

i'm sorry, but it dosen't care if the suicide guard is minor, all the guards are minor according to the minor character page, so no, the page will not be deleted.

Yes, they're minor, however they're taking up too much space. Besides, that page just determines who is minor.
http://scpcontainmentbreach.wikia.com/w ... ds#In-game
Here's the page. The other pages will be decimated to make the Wiki much cleaner.

Minor character page is extremely messy, and most of the minor characters don't warrant their own page. I suggested listing minor characters under the pages for their NPC type, for example with guards, near the bottom wold be a section called "list of known Guards" and all the guards listed with a brief description. The minor characters shouldn't have a page unless they play a major part...

Also, why is there a vehicles page?
wwwhhhhhhyyyyy??

Glitch wrote:Minor character page is extremely messy, and most of the minor characters don't warrant their own page. I suggested listing minor characters under the pages for their NPC type, for example with guards, near the bottom wold be a section called "list of known Guards" and all the guards listed with a brief description. The minor characters shouldn't have a page unless they play a major part...

Also, why is there a vehicles page?
wwwhhhhhhyyyyy??

Like I said, check out the Guard page.

Wait, a vehicles page? is that a car not involved in the game? *Sigh* the people on the wiki disappoint me.