Manned mechs are retarded.
Unmanned mechs, however...
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#12... Do they HAVE to give it a face?
DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
Atheros drivers SUCK!
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#13.....If I saw that....I would probably shit my pants.
My name is John...Yes you can call me that...Yes it's a bland name, but it gets the job done.
I Warhammer 40K harder than you.
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#14Seems good and all but what if it flips over? Seriously hit a bit of uneven terrain or take a close hit from an explosion/sudden shock force and you are completely dead in the water. Also a Tank can carry far more powerful weapons than a Mech like that could, so in a one v one fight the Tank has the Armour and Weapon advantage.
SCP:CB Administrator. 99% of my statements are my own and do not represent the official developers viewpoint.
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#15clop-clop-clop, clop-clop-clopThat one guy wrote:.....If I saw that....I would probably shit my pants.
"Wha-"
BANG-BANG-BANG, BANG-BANG-BANG
Terminated.
DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
Atheros drivers SUCK!
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#16That's pretty much how it would go down.Destructoid wrote:clop-clop-clop, clop-clop-clopThat one guy wrote:.....If I saw that....I would probably shit my pants.
"Wha-"
BANG-BANG-BANG, BANG-BANG-BANG
Terminated.
My name is John...Yes you can call me that...Yes it's a bland name, but it gets the job done.
I Warhammer 40K harder than you.
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#19I have a plastic model of that one.́̄̔͝ wrote:I wish all mechs are like this....
Spoiler
DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
Atheros drivers SUCK!
Re: Japan Combat Mech
#20Source? I'm more interested in reading about this than looking at pretty pictures.