I know, right? SCP-682 has been implemented into the game, but in a recent post he revealed that there is one SCP more ominous than SCP-682, which has not been detailed enough.++Focus++ wrote:No, he told me in a PM that there would be Euclid and Safe SCP's aswell. SCP-682 would be... FUCKING SWEEET!UnknownGlaze wrote:Meh, about 3 weeks later. Deserves a bump, maybe.
Anywho, I have a question:
This is a Keter class failure, correct me if I'm wrong, but does this mean that there will only be Keter Class SCP's?
Also, what could be more ominous than SCP-682?
Re: SCP: The game
#72![Image](http://i.imgur.com/EgdB8.gif)
But then again they're probably not gonna reply since their hard at work. I CAN'T WAIT ANY FREAKING LONGER!!!!
![SCP-173 :173:](./images/smilies/173.gif)
![SCP-106 :106:](./images/smilies/106.gif)
![SCP-096 :096:](./images/smilies/096.gif)
Re: SCP: The game
#77Somewhere between 1% and 99%
Don't call it a comeback, I never left
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsE8eN ... DnN6kvweew
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsE8eN ... DnN6kvweew
Re: SCP: The game
#7840-50% still, from what I heard.
I lost weight just by running up and down the stairs...