Thread making has been disabled for newly registered users, this is due to spambots which have been making accounts and spamming the forum.

You need to have three posts to your account before you can start new threads, it is a recent rule.

I managed to get a 100x56 39.5 KB Animated GIF signature, although it appears no animated pictures are allowed now, wow.

Btw, this is the picture:

Steelpoint wrote:You need to have three posts to your account before you can start new threads, it is a recent rule.

Seems fair. Glad I reached mine before the rule came into place.

I feel I was wrongfully given a warning. I don't see why I should be given any sort of punishment for trying to help people out. I made no drama over hug's wiki, I was just merely informing him that the forum and him would be better off separated, as a means to prevent more pain in the future. Tell me how I am being the evil one in this situation.

Awesomeguy147 wrote:I feel I was wrongfully given a warning. I don't see why I should be given any sort of punishment for trying to help people out. I made no drama over hug's wiki, I was just merely informing him that the forum and him would be better off separated, as a means to prevent more pain in the future. Tell me how I am being the evil one in this situation.

Well I can think of why, these are your comments on the thread in question.

O_O....... burn it....... burn it now.

You really don't understand how things work do you. No matter what, people will hate you, and everything you do shall be destroyed, just because you are too dumb to know when to leave.

^This. and if you can ban hug while your at it, it would probably save us a lot of trouble.

You broke rule 4, "do not attack or threaten a forum member".

The warning stands as issued.

Steelpoint wrote:

Awesomeguy147 wrote:I feel I was wrongfully given a warning. I don't see why I should be given any sort of punishment for trying to help people out. I made no drama over hug's wiki, I was just merely informing him that the forum and him would be better off separated, as a means to prevent more pain in the future. Tell me how I am being the evil one in this situation.

Well I can think of why, these are your comments on the thread in question.

O_O....... burn it....... burn it now.

You really don't understand how things work do you. No matter what, people will hate you, and everything you do shall be destroyed, just because you are too dumb to know when to leave.

^This. and if you can ban hug while your at it, it would probably save us a lot of trouble.

You broke rule 4, "do not attack or threaten a forum member".

The warning stands as issued.

1.) When I said "burn it now" that was the response to the NSFW pictures that commanderpro100 put on the wiki, the sentence had nothing to do with hug.

2.) I was informing hug that making the wiki again will not work for it will be attacked for the same reason, because he is hated. even Mjpenguin1 agrees with me when he said:

They all (and I don't know why exactly) hate you and they will destroy anything you make.

and again I was informing him that the smartest thing for him to do would be to leave, as he is only causing pain for himself and others with his presence.

3.) This sentence is true. Do you seriously not see the ending hug is making for himself. It's obvious that any good quality of his mind is forsaken, and thus he will blindly follow down a path til it is his doom. That sentence was neither attack nor threat, but advise. Advise to the moderator who would take action to put hug out of the inevitable misery that would await him if he stays on this forum. You were the one that took action, and as a keeper of peace in this forum, you have failed.

Awesomeguy147 wrote:1.) When I said "burn it now" that was the response to the NSFW pictures that commanderpro100 put on the wiki, the sentence had nothing to do with hug.

Commander wasn't the one who added porn to the wiki, just so you know.

Proof: Considering that he already had an account, why would he make another to post said porn? There'd be no need.

Insanity's Bane wrote:

Awesomeguy147 wrote:1.) When I said "burn it now" that was the response to the NSFW pictures that commanderpro100 put on the wiki, the sentence had nothing to do with hug.

Commander wasn't the one who added porn to the wiki, just so you know.

Proof: Considering that he already had an account, why would he make another to post said porn? There'd be no need.

He was the only one that I knew trolled said wiki, so I assumed, either way the statement still stands that I was talking about the porn, not hug.

Sorry. But expecting everyone else to read into your comments the way you feel is... appropriate? is wishful thinking.
Although Commander was far worse, you weren't that far behind from what I had seen.