Re: Dev Topic #3

#301
Jesus christ guys. Regalis just finished his service at the army, and what does he see? The forum screaming "The old engine sucks, give us a new one!"
That coming from the very same people that praise the hell out of whatever Update of SCP-CB was released.

You want a SCP game on a different engine? You're welcome to try it yourself. Sorry but people are starting to sound immensely ungrateful here.
My Youtube Account: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSerimah
Image

Re: Dev Topic #3

#302
Serimah wrote:Jesus christ guys. Regalis just finished his service at the army, and what does he see? The forum screaming "The old engine sucks, give us a new one!"
That coming from the very same people that praise the hell out of whatever Update of SCP-CB was released.

You want a SCP game on a different engine? You're welcome to try it yourself. Sorry but people are starting to sound immensely ungrateful here.
^This guy is sane. Have a cookie.

Anyways, moving off of that, my current project is coming along nicely... you might say it'll make you over the moon...
SCP - Box of Horrors v0.8.0b
Twitter
Github Profile

Re: Dev Topic #3

#303
InnocentSam wrote:It's possible, but seeing as the game is fine without it, there's no need to redirect effort from new content to aesthetic pleasures.
Good then go ahead and implement it :P
But still there are the MAVs and the SCP's AI and all that stuff so yeah..

Re: Dev Topic #3

#304
InnocentSam wrote:Anyways, moving off of that, my current project is coming along nicely... you might say it'll make you over the moon...
This has convinced me its SCP-120, i'm with Omniary on that.

I agree with Serimah, afterall, It's whatever Regalis decides, it's his game and if hes not comfortable with other engines, then he doesn't have to change.
ERIC IS LOVE, ERIC IS LIFE.

Re: Dev Topic #3

#305
SCP-500 wrote:I agree with Serimah, afterall, It's whatever Regalis decides, it's his game and if hes not comfortable with other engines, then he doesn't have to change.
This is what you guys have to note. It is Regalis' desicion, and I haven't seen anyone screaming. We made a very sane vote on it, and the majority of the people say a new engine. Since Regalis' made the game, it is up to him to accept it or veto. 2/3 vote!

Re: Dev Topic #3

#306
I don't seen anyone screaming at Regalis to make an engine change, it is merely an suggestion from what I can gather with some good points.
SCP:CB Administrator. 99% of my statements are my own and do not represent the official developers viewpoint.

Re: Dev Topic #3

#307
InnocentSam wrote: ^This guy is sane. Have a cookie.

Anyways, moving off of that, my current project is coming along nicely... you might say it'll make you over the moon...
You called Serimah sane...

As for the project, my moneys on this:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1960-j
I'm not here as much right now, mention me on our Discord server if you need anything.

Re: Dev Topic #3

#308
Ltn Vasquez wrote:If he's coming back, he'll have to address the problem of the new engine. There is practically no competition as to whether we should do it or not, but I'm worried that Regalis might choose to stick to the familiar engine despite our protests.
That's clearly a demand, not a suggestion. But yes, most people here do ask "nicely".]If he's coming back, he'll have to address the problem of the new engine. There is practically no competition as to whether we should do it or not, but I'm worried that Regalis might choose to stick to the familiar engine despite our protests.[/quote]

That's clearly a demand, not a suggestion. But yes, most people here do ask

GLITCH! WHAT DO YOU MEAN I'M NOT SANE!
BACON!
BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!
BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!
My Youtube Account: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSerimah
Image

Re: Dev Topic #3

#309
Serimah wrote:
Ltn Vasquez wrote:If he's coming back, he'll have to address the problem of the new engine. There is practically no competition as to whether we should do it or not, but I'm worried that Regalis might choose to stick to the familiar engine despite our protests.
That's clearly a demand, not a suggestion. But yes, most people here do ask "nicely".]If he's coming back, he'll have to address the problem of the new engine. There is practically no competition as to whether we should do it or not, but I'm worried that Regalis might choose to stick to the familiar engine despite our protests.
That's clearly a demand, not a suggestion. But yes, most people here do ask

GLITCH! WHAT DO YOU MEAN I'M NOT SANE!
BACON!
BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!
BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON!BACON![/quote]
Something went wrong here.
Anyways, I did not demand. I made a suggestion before, I just hope he accepts it rather than deny.