Re: SCP Suggestions General
#111110-Montauk is a entirely different thing, not related at all to the recall protocol.
God is perfect -> Nobody is perfect -> I'm nobody --> I'm perfect --> I'm God.
Ive seen a post where regalis was talking about this, but i havnt heard that they were putting this in the next patch. Can i have a link to this please.That Same Anon wrote:The Mobile Task Force will recointain the SCP's in v0.6. this includes: SCP-173(loading him into a box, bringing to the containment chamber, closing door), SCP-106(Recall-Protocall 110-Monutak) And SCP-096(when he is added, they put a bag over his head and bring him back.) they then have you as their main priority, so once 0.6 comes out, i advise to get out ASAP, because the MTF Will be as bad as in 0.5.6 (their AI shows they know exactly where you are) but in a different way: They're Dangerous. i advise to pick up an armored vest, once 0.6 comes out. and spare medkits. after all, there IS going to be a "Damage" Bleeding system for getting shot by MTF.mcrubxpcod wrote:Hey guys, how about adding the possibility to have 173 contained? Maybe have something as simple as reconnecting the energy, then lead 173 to the beggining of the game and then contain him.
That Same Anon Out.
-----=TRANSMISSION END=-----
YesMrJPenguin1 wrote:I do like the idea of the MTF just stop shooting you and say "Reloading". It would be helpful if they kept shoot at you while you're in cover and then after shooting 50 bullets (Standard number of bullets for a P90) they would have to reload and then you could run past them. When I was in Godmode they just kept shooting and shooting and shooting...
If you don't want to read: Reloading for the MTFs
Lusor1111 wrote:110-Montauk is a entirely different thing, not related at all to the recall protocol.
Omniary wrote:If I do remember correctly, Regalis did not mention anything about 173's containment for the next update. He only mentioned they'd carry out the recall protocol, I'm not sure if they'll put 173 in the box by the time 0.6 comes out.
Return to “General discussion”